Is this the beginning of the end for the Iraq occupation?

@laylomo (165)
United States
December 16, 2007 1:51pm CST
British troops handed responsibility for security in the Southern Iraq province of Basra, which has been under the control of the allied invasion five years ago. Britain has control the south since the war began with troops based in Basra. It has been working to withdraw its troop from the region, which as always been more stable than Baghdad. It still has approximately 5000 troops there at the moment, but will try and scale it back to 4500 by the end of December. By spring, the British military hopes to lower its troop deployment to 2500. Do you think that this is the beginning of the end of the Iraq War? Do you believe that the war is beginning to stabilize?
1 person likes this
3 responses
@Adoniah (7513)
• United States
16 Dec 07
Wouldn't that be wonderful if true? The only way the war will end is when and if the outside factions stop meddling and when and if the Shiites and the Sunnis' can work out their differences. That said, do you wand to aske your question again? The fact that the government which is supposed to be a Democracy, is overlayered by a state religion that is not Democratic by any means cannot possibly function for very long without constant intercession from outside forces. Then you have the Shiites and the Sunnis who follow two almost diametric forms of Islam in this same government run by religion but whose religion? Yeah, lets see if the war is over.
1 person likes this
@Adoniah (7513)
• United States
19 Dec 07
Some debate this is, where is the poster? The responders are here!
@laylomo (165)
• United States
21 Dec 07
Sorry, been away for a few days. I still think the end of occupation is possible. Let me explain. So the first thing you mention is if outside factions stop meddling. I think the "outside factions" you talk of are, for the most part, fueled by foreign occupation. There was a study that pointed that American occupation was not kindly look at by the Iraqi people and provides an incentive for others to join terrorist organizations. If this is not your definition, please clarify. The government is divided amongst religious lines, yes. In order to solve this, I think a soft partition is in order (such as Senator Biden's plan). But many criticize it for not working. But look at the case of Bosnia. Bosnia, like Iraq, was filled with violence and had sectarian cleansing. But after implementation, Bosnia is now a peaceful, democratic state. By leaving most of the power within the religious lines and leaving few broad national matters to the national government, all these complications can be bypassed. You may argue that religion and democracy interlap, but democracy and religion are not mutually exclusive concepts. But in no way do I think that the war can be resolved peacefully. Nor do I believe everything will end happily like a fairy tale. Even in the case of Bosnia, even after the Dayton Accords were signed, there was still violence. It takes time.
1 person likes this
@schummi (924)
• India
18 Dec 07
yeah this is a pretty good news and i think things are sure going to stablize a bit for sometime and will require to unddergo the required changes with the verification and allocation of the surroundings and the work wil move on with the released date of sending in the requests...
@remark (9)
• China
17 Dec 07
i tell you that it is no freedom when other country responsibility for your country. Every country should under the control of others.Or it is not only the lose of country but the lose of human right. that all