SORA strikes again!
By mgmagana
@mgmagana (3618)
United States
7 responses
@luvstochat (6907)
• United States
30 Dec 07
They aged her just in time for he to be kidnapped in a few weeks. I don't know what the point of aging her was they never have her on the show anyways. She is always with a babysitter it seems.
I didn't think the girls who played Claire before were very cute I have seen pictures of the new girl but will have to see her on screen to see how cute she will be.
2 people like this
@alexsis (2149)
• United States
29 Dec 07
I didn't know they were twins either. I hate it when they age people so fast on soap opera shows. I heard that the little girl that will be playing the new Claire is really five. But she will be playing as a 4 year old. But I liked the twins.
@Thoroughrob (11742)
• United States
29 Dec 07
I am glad they have aged her but I think they went a bit too far. She did need to be older.
2 people like this
@sojournseeker (1244)
• United States
4 Jan 08
I think they did a bit too much aging . . . as her hair is four inches longer, darker and her face is skinnier. Plus, she looks nothing like Belle, but mostly Shawn, poor kid !
@yanxchick (250)
• United States
3 Jan 08
I hate when they age the characters in the show. But I understand the point. It's just annoying. The new Claire doesn't even look like they old Claire.
1 person likes this
@dayzz25 (552)
• United States
4 Jan 08
I think they went a little too old also. They should have went in the middle of the two ages. One day she's 1 the next day she's 5....lol. I'm glad that they are aging her though. I don't know what took them so long. Have a great day.