Clintons, The NAFTA family and Bush, The Oil Family, it appears the hidden
@friend2friends (1636)
United States
January 10, 2008 1:56pm CST
agenda was to serve the interest of the Fortune 500 needs, not the needs of the American people. One Big Ponzi scheme that would land any regular Joe in jail. Enron tried this, Health South tried this, MCI did too. Thousands lost their jobs and many exec's went to jail.
Voters needs to wake up and start asking the right questions. All the hard labor that people have worked to only turn over tax income to the gov't and then sends tax payers money to foreign countries and the gov't is borrowing money from communist countries.
Hello America, anyone home...
Do you see a problem here ?
1 person likes this
3 responses
@RowenaTheWitch (947)
• Italy
12 Jan 08
Err sorry friend2friend but I don't have understood your post. Maybe it's a proble of language because I'm not english. What is the problem with Clintons about?
1 person likes this
@friend2friends (1636)
• United States
25 Jan 08
Bill Clinton signed off on the nafta agreement during his term, this resulted in corporations closing here in the USA and going to other countries. Therefore, this disrupted thousands and millions of people to loose there job and seek new employment.
@makemoneywithadsense (431)
• Cambodia
26 Jan 08
The Democrats are just a proxy for the Neocons using psychological tricks. There's no more Democrats nor Republicans just Rockedem and Rockepub working both the Industrial Military Complex:
So even if Bush is discarded Hillary or someone else from the Democrats will continue :
"The US arms industry is backing Hillary Clinton for President"
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/10/19/following-hillarys-money/
1 person likes this
@hometyme (288)
• United States
10 Jan 08
I hope the "wacky" polls are an indication that people are tired of business as usual. I'm saying that our government is NOT doing thier job.
I hope the house is mostly cleaned! Have they answered any questions? I don't think any enemy of the US would be soft on Hilary just because she's a woman.
1 person likes this
@friend2friends (1636)
• United States
10 Jan 08
Hi there hometyme,
Be funny if Edwards made the upset and won. I don't have a problem with Hillary, but she is married to Bill and Bill signed the Nafta agreement. Don't you think Hillary was in the know when all was going on.
Bill is not going to want Hillary to tarnish his name, Only Slick Willey can do that and have the public still admire him.
@hometyme (288)
• United States
10 Jan 08
I think it would indicate that Hillary knew what was going on when she said, "We're the president". That IS a quote of what I saw her say.
I've heard 'change' for the last several elections. I'm a little confused by what they mean by it, now.
I don't think the "same" of either party has the answer. The change needs to be in leadership - with an emphasis on 'leadership'.
Why is China buying "T-bills" as fast as they can and why should non-Americans even have the right to own ANY of the Federal Reserve Bank, not to mention MOST of it? Hillary, Slick Willy and many of the others, surely, do know about it, while most Americans do not seem to.
Is the Federal Reserve Bank, just another industry? Is that what it was set up for?
Research this. Prove me wrong!
1 person likes this
@theprogamer (10534)
• United States
12 Jan 08
Hometyme, keep up the efforts, you've at least got support here.
Aside from my main response, I've also got my suspicions on the market and recent events with the treasury/finances. And yes seems like everyone can through around the word "change" but in reality not much has changed over the last couple of decades (nothing of real political significance). You have hundreds of clowns elected to represent the people and do what is best for the country but they only represent themselves and are in things only for their own interests (power). You have failing government programs and people still clamoring for more money as a solution, ignoring the fact that that's been the solution for years and the product stays the same (or gets worse. Examples: education, transportation, etc). And there is more. I'm not expecting much from any of the candidates, I say aim low for all of them. -_-
1 person likes this
@theprogamer (10534)
• United States
12 Jan 08
I've been following some of this, along with other nonsense that hasn't been answered (and thats both administrations). People should pay attention but thanks to society overall, the useless and suppressive media, and people thinking one party or the other is the second coming, we end up with scores of empty flapping head clowns running things into the dirt. Its all a scam when looked at carefully. 16 year dynasty of nothing soon to be continued by the look of things. And with this, nothing has significantly changed stateside its just government business as usual(along with the power grabbing and rights revoking) and private sector business as usual. Fine, everyone can go play one-card monte with the parties or whatever bogus blame games they want. Its been that way for years, I don't see it changing anytime soon. -_- The best part is the sheeple will clap for more, while being screwed over royally.
1 person likes this
@friend2friends (1636)
• United States
25 Jan 08
Hey progamer, well you pretty much summed it out. Thanks for the post
