What to make of the new information about the assasination of Robert F. Kennedy?

I read the affidavit (or interview - can't remember which) by the coroner in the RFK case years ago and he was removed from the case and not permitted to state officially that there were additional wounds inconsistent with Sirhan Sirhan being the sole shooter. Some shots apparently came from behind, but the government put a clamp on it. They still do. The only logical reason is that someone official is involved and they don't want to admit it was a political assassination and not a terrorist assassination. I have also read something about the possibility that Teddy's unfortunate accident in Chappaquiddick was another assassination attempt, which would explain why he didn't get the woman out of the car and stayed hidden from the sights of whoever had tried to kill him. I personally find it despicable that he would allow a woman to die, regardless of his political standing. But, if someone was trying to kill him, then I can understand. I don't like it, but I can understand it. I'm not sure what to believe after all these years, but with the Kennedy's having so much money and our government being willing to lie while breaking the law, how do we know what's true and what isn't. I think it's all possible anymore.

I dont know about this piece of information. Can you elaborate a little bit more about this.

I didn't know that there was any evidence in the Robert Kennedy case. But I didn't know in the case of John F. Kennedy a lot of people say that the wrong person was accused of the murder and that the shots came from a different direction.