Only Two Teams at the 2008 Olympics? China and the United States.

United States
August 14, 2008 9:59pm CST
From the coverage of the 2008 Olympics on network television, it would appear that there are only two teams competing: China and the United States. By limiting the viewer’s choices of events and teams, how can brotherhood among nations prevail at the games? The focus of the games should be the various options for competition. In this way the Games could demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of each country. We only observe events where the United States performs well, and this may prove detrimental to the role of sport in the world.
3 responses
@Humbug25 (12540)
15 Aug 08
Hi there horacehijo1 I can assure you that Great Britain are definately competing and have won several gold medals already. It is very wrong of them to be so biased about what you view on television. It would make me not want to watch!!
• United States
15 Aug 08
Humbug25 Unfortunately, here in the US we are limited on network television (more or less) to gymnastics, swimming and track and field, events where we win a lot of gold medals! A Brazilian friend of mine said that she was disappointed because of the lack of events and countries...And yes, it makes it so that you don't want to watch (plus we don't have cable...!)
@Humbug25 (12540)
15 Aug 08
You're kidding you don't have cable? I thought all American's had cable!! I spent some time out in NJ and never met an American that didn't have cable!! How many channels can you get?
@efc872 (1077)
• Jamaica
4 Sep 08
I agree with you, but who should shoulder the blame. Look at how USA blocked the live running of the performance of the Jamaican team. Jamaican living in the USA got up to date results from other feed and by telephone. I think it is a D--- shame.
• India
1 Sep 08
thats not right.this yaer we saw the fall of American supremacy. in men's and women's relays they show their overconfidence. in the next year there will be more good players from other parts of the world like India