What is the world's fastest computer?
October 16, 2008 7:06am CST
To put things in perspective, let's start with the computer sitting on your des-- the computer you use on a day-to-day basis to browse the Internet, handle spreadsheets, create documents, etc. Most people have something like a Pentium computer running Windows, or a Macintosh. A computer like this can execute approximately 100 million instructions per second. Your particular machine might be twice that fast or half that fast, but that's the ballpark. The fastest computer in the world is much faster than that, and it is sitting right on top of your shoulders! The human brain is an amazing computing device and the fastest processor available right now. Let me give you an example: Your desktop computer is just starting to get to the point where it can "understand" speech and take dictation, translating spoken words into written words. It can only understand one speaker, and that speaker has to train it for about 20 minutes, and the dictation software will still make a lot of mistakes. So 100 million instructions per second can barely handle dictation. In the 2006 TOP500 list, which ranks supercomputers by speed, the top three supercomputers are as follows: 1 IBM's BlueGene/L - 360 teraflops 2 IBM's BGW - 115 teraflops 3 IBM's ASC Purple - 93 teraflops Another supercomputer called MDGrape-3, built by the Japanese company RIKEN, has a theoretical maximum speed of 1 petaflop (1 guadrillion operations per second), which is three times faster than the BlueGene/L. But MDGrape-3 can't run the official ranking software of the TOP500 list, so BlueGene/L remains at the top of the list at 360 trillion operations per second, which is pretty fast...but it's still not as fast as your brain.
17 Oct 08
lol! I don't think you can get such statistics on a brain, because teraflops or petaflops or whatever are numerical indications of the power of a machine, of an electronic device. Sure, we do also need electricity running through our bodies to be able to function but that doesn't mean they can measure us with such numbers, I don't think that's possible anyways.