COT (Car Of Tomorrow)--better racing or competition killer?
By shoreboy31
@shoreboy31 (1433)
United States
November 6, 2006 11:41pm CST
With NASCAR's announcement that the Car Of Tomorrow will see action next year, do you see this as something that will actually make racing better, or will it just benefit those teams with the most money who have the resources to research, build, and tune them?
1 person likes this
3 responses
@babygirl3212001 (302)
• United States
7 Nov 06
hey there baby....im not sure bout it...love you
1 person likes this
@shoreboy31 (1433)
• United States
19 Nov 06
Aren't they scheduled for 'Dega next year? If so that will be the tell-tale race for them...
@samsonskola (3357)
• United States
19 Nov 06
I hate them, I've heard SO many drivers talking about how they dislike them, and I think the teams are going to have a LOT of reconstruction issues and hardships if they continue with that monstrosity...it will mean a totally new package on each car to set them up...and with the limited practice tracks they get, I can't see anyone being able to have the package in their car set up good enough to race..it will just be a major disaster ..There should be a limit as to how far Nascar officials can go..and changing a drivers car should be totally off limits...the cars as they are now look good too...that COT is horrible..I think every Nascar fan should email Nascar and tell them that we do not want drivers to change to COT's.
@shoreboy31 (1433)
• United States
19 Nov 06
Yeah, you know I think this kills the already struggling one and two car teams, and benefits the multi-car stables like Roush, Yates, Ganassi, Hendrick (yechhh!!!) and DEI. The monetary problem is a huge one. Fortunately they are only running a limited schedule next year. I guess we will have to wait and see, but honestly, this is NASCAR where tweaking, and tryng new things has always been a tradition, and not IROC.
