Three Controversial Questions
By laglen
@laglen (19759)
United States
January 16, 2009 12:41pm CST
It is my understanding that the liberal/democrat agenda is to support legal abortions but oppose the death penalty.
First question: Is this true?
Second question: what the??? It is ok to murder an innocent baby, but not somebody convicted of murdering somebody else?
Third question: If partial birth abortion is legal, shouldn't we be able to abort up to say, 13 years old? That gives a little more time to decide if you want the child.
Ok, I am ready for the abuse - let it rip!
1 person likes this
4 responses
@ucmducks (22)
• United States
17 Jan 09
First question, nope
Second question, nope
Third question, I thank if a women is packing a 13 year old around in her uterus, it wouldn't be murder by far, but self defense. I mean good Gawd, the body can only stretch so far before bursting, don't ya think?
2 people like this
@sunshinelady (7609)
• United States
17 Jan 09
Your understanding is right. They have determined that a fetus is not truly a living growing human. How they came to this conclussion is beyond me. When you get a ultrasound it is very obvious that the fetus is a living growing human. But some people will use anything to justify this decision which I am fully against. I also think that if someone murders someone at the point when they take the persons life in my book they forfeit their own life. Your third question is the worst of all decisions. A partial abortion is the worst kind which I think all abortions are wrong.
1 person likes this
@CRIVAS (1815)
• Canada
16 Jan 09
I have to agree with you on this one. I don't understand how it can be okay to abort a child that didn't ask to be brought into the world, but to keep murderers around. Then again, I don't really agree with half the things that the government decides on. I guess that they have different priorities.
2 people like this
