Cable TV and satellite TV

United States
March 9, 2009 6:56pm CST
In the competition of Cable TV and Satellite television, which one do you most likely to subscribe? I found that Cable TV was way too expensive than Satellite TV. In comparison of number of channels, satellite TV offer more channels, and cheaper price too. What do you think?
3 people like this
4 responses
• United Kingdom
12 Mar 09
I definitely love cable television. I have had cable for quite a few years now and I don't think I could ever change to satellite. This thing is, I live in one of these new complex buildings and you are not allowed to place satellite dishes on the outside so I guess my only option is to have cable. I have quite a lot of channels anyhow so there is always something to watch. Andrew
• United States
11 Mar 09
i know i'm sick of our cable company. they keep going up but yet they keep taking off good channels that i like. i haven't checked on satelite but am getting ready to do something different. for some reason they charge me more than they do others w/the same service that i'm getting which is extended basic. mine will be $3-4 more than my friends. i think they need some competition.
• United States
10 Mar 09
I agree sat is better then cable and cost is cheaperBUT I worked for dish network and I can tell you it depend's were you live at if you have element's that will stop the singal like rain snow our the installer put's up your dish in the fall were there are no leave's until spring when there are it will stop your singal.. So like i said depend's on were you live and if you want TV our watch snow..when working there that was the bigest problem while there so good luck..
• United States
10 Mar 09
I never compared the tow of them. So I would not really know the answer to this. I do know cable is just too expensive altogheter. I just canceled time warner form my home this past week.