Latest Harry Potter - Better than previous versions?

August 9, 2009 8:30am CST
Was it really better than of previous versions?
1 person likes this
4 responses
• United States
4 Sep 09
You can't really compare them directly like that. They are all different stories so it's more a matter of whether you liked this story or not. The Half-Blood Prince was probably my least favorite of the books so it makes sense that I wasn't going to be as into the movie. They left out a lot of the book, some things that I thought were fairly important to the story, and they added some things that absolutely shouldn't have been added but overall I thought it was good. I cried like a baby at the end, not so much because of what happened because I knew how it ended but because of the reactions to what happened (especially McGonagall's reaction ).
• India
9 Aug 09
no it is not by ny means. the third part (prisnor of azkaban) is the best among all 5th and 6th part both sucks
• India
9 Aug 09
Hi, friend. I must say it was a real disaster. But, i don`t think there was a big fault from the movie production, but it was the story that didn`t contain much to be of real presentation expertise. But, i love the seventh part story a lot, and i am looking forward to it. Well, these are just my thoughts, especially coz i expect a lot from the harry potter series. On a general scale, one may rate it above average. Happy Mylotting!!
@yelrihs (301)
• Australia
9 Aug 09
its funny, its not much of the magic, but its still good..