Do u think shawn michaels is better than undertaker?

India
May 23, 2010 7:03am CST
Hi friends, I like shawn michaels as well as undertaker also. But the more i like is shawn michaels. Shawn michaels would have won wrestlemania 26 easily with undertaker. That was the hope of all the people. But it happened the other way. What was your hope of it? Thank you Happy mylotting
5 responses
@roxyoo7 (246)
• India
6 Jun 10
Dude its all predecided.So no question of who is better.We just can't decide that by just analyzing who won and who lost.Looking at the size of both the wrestlers i guess undertaker can take down shawn any day in a fair fight.
@roxyoo7 (246)
• India
6 Jun 10
Dude its all predecided.So no question of who is better.We just can't decide that by just analyzing who won and who lost.Looking at the size of both the wrestlers i guess undertaker can take down shawn any day in a fair fight.
23 May 10
Shawn Michaels is good, but definately not as good as the Undertaker.
23 May 10
In terms of pure talent, a lot of people say HBK is the best ever. I prefer Bret Hart, but Ric Flair, HHH, Mick Foley and many others would say Shawn. I like the Undertaker as a character, but never liked seeing him in the ring. His wrestling style has always bored the life out of me.
@roxyoo7 (246)
• India
6 Jun 10
Dude its all predecided.So no question of who is better.We just can't decide that by just analyzing who won and who lost.Looking at the size of both the wrestlers i guess undertaker can take down shawn any day in a fair fight.