Should the city recoup the losses from the Michael Jackson Memorial?

United States
June 19, 2010 8:52pm CST
"Jun. 14-20: The Big Payback. Los Angeles To Recoup From Michael Jackson Memorial Posted Sat Jun 19, 2010 9:16am PDT by Billy Johnson, Jr. in That's Really Week The debate over who should cover the expenses Los Angeles incurred after Michael Jackson's memorial last July has finally been settled. The estate of Michael Jackson and AEG, the company that produced the event at the Staples Center, have agreed to pay the city $1.3 million, Councilwoman Jan Perry said Friday, according to the Los Angeles Times. The city's general fund will receive $1 million, and the remaining $300,000 will go to the Los Angeles Police Foundation, Perry added. The general fund supports public safety and parks, and the LAPF funds will be used to cover equipment at the police department." Yahoo front page today on June 19,2010 So my question is what do you all think about this. Should the city be paid for the ceremony or just up and forget about the losses. I know the court ruling is final, but how do you all feel about the fact that they actually made a decent ruling on a matter of Michael Jackson versus los angelos.
No responses