Between the INSANE and SANITY

is the excuse that all counsel seeking murderers, insane to pass off to your client to achieve reduction of sentence or is admitted to a school. It lends much to the trap lies. The main obstacle of the law are lawyers.

It is disturbingly easy (physically) to commit homicide. What makes it painful for an average person to murder is the fact that the victim is a sentient being; he or she is human, and has feelings. However, if a human is insane, obviously, he or she does not think like the norm. If "ill" enough, he or she will have the ability to kill another, without feeling guilt. Killing another human is rather easy; he may not even need a weapon, if the victim is helpless enough. Thus, an unstable being can, within a few seconds, kill another being. The "murderer", in this case, may not be aware of his actions, nor the intent to kill. This fact must be taken into consideration. True, he did take the life of a beloved being, but if he had no intention, why should he be given the full punishment? It's understandable for the family to fight strongly for the lifetime sentence or execution, but would it be fair for the "killer", a human with no control over his actions, to die or spend his life behind bars because of an accident? Instead of killing a helpless man who does not realize that he had erred, the more plausible thing to do would be to teach him why he was wrong, and give him the help that he needs. And of course, with such a lenient law, there will be abusers. There are those who will kill intentionally, and feign insanity just to elude the punishment. Unfortunately, most of the time, we cannot tell whether the sick are really sick.