Do think "Jadeja" and "Rohit Sharma" should be a part of the Indian team?

India
August 22, 2010 2:53pm CST
These are these two players who have got their chances more than often in the Indian team. I do not know on what basis commentators say that these two players are good for the team. Do you think in a country like India that has over 1 bn population, players like these should be given so many chances in the national team? Who could be the alternative of these two players? Why is Karthik included in the Indian side when there are so many other good batsman available in India, do you think Karthik is better than "Robin Uthappa", "Virat Kohli (I m mentioning him becoz they prefer Karthik over Kohli)"? Who else do you think should be out of the Indian cricket team and who should be included?
2 responses
gunjandubey
@gunjandubey (512)
• India
24 Aug 10
Ravindra jadeja is a very lucky player, he doesn't deserve to be in the side though. In actual he is playing in the side as a genuine all-rounder, but is doing nothing in batting and bowling part time like the way yuvraj and sehwag does. Instead of him we should try Irfan pathan or Ravichandran Ashwin, they both are better batsmen than him. On the other hand rohit sharma is a talented player and is a promising youngster unlike ravindra jadeja. But the player he is replaced(Virat Kohli) in this series is not justified. Till the asia cup selectors and captain were backing-up virat kohli but in this series suddenly rohit sharma is selected ahead of him for no reason. This is not the way youngsters should be treated.....
grvdubey11
@grvdubey11 (1879)
• India
23 Aug 10
I think they are given too many chances and about Jadeja he is a good bowler but not at all suits at no 7 as a batsman.He neither makes fast runs for India at no 7 nor he plays when India is in trouble by losing 4 5 wickets early.Rohit sharma is struggling with form from long time now.I guess Ashwin could be a better choice than Jadeja as he is a good bowler and can give contribution with bat too.