What is missing from today's entertainment?

@skydancer (2101)
United States
May 5, 2011 5:01am CST
By entertainment, I mean, movies, music, television and the like. Most people - particularly those old enough to remember what things were like before (or younger people who just happen to be counter-cultural) would agree that while today's entertainment industry may produce something quality here and there, for the most part it's obscured by all the cheap, relatively soulless mainstream output. There was a time when mainstream entertainment wasn't so bad. In fact, in past eras it was quite good. Of course everyone has their own point of view on when exactly it all started to change, but my question is this: What is today's entertainment lacking? I would say first of all that I don't like how they feel they have to distort history and cultural facts or go against the text book-based films just to be politically correct or to appeal to the masses... or just plain don't do their research where research would be warranted. Moreover, however, I just feel today's entertainment lacks "soul." The acting was better, the singing was better, the musical arrangements were better, the scripts were better, inspiration seemed to run deeper, details were more meticulously attended to. Now the technology is superior, but that's the only thing that is, and it even seems to be an excuse for laziness in some cases. I know a lot of people notice this lacking of soul as well, but what does that mean to you exactly? What would you like to see brought back in the entertainment world that has now become just a thing of the past? I am curious to know which elements seem to be the most missed. I am asking this question because I am establishing my production company and one of my goals is to restore some of the missing elements in my own work, but I would be curious to have some different perspectives. Thanks in advance.
4 responses
• Southend-On-Sea, England
5 May 11
Speaking as an older person and at the same time not wanting to put younger people down, I think you've hit the nail on the head when you say that a lot of entertainment in more recent years (for me I noticed the decline begin in the late 1980s and it accelerated fast through the 1990s and the early part of this century) lacks soul. As far as music is concerned, I think a really good example would be to listen to a couple of tracks of what they call R&B these days, then listen to say a couple of Otis Redding tracks from the 1960s and the difference is very apparent - Otis Redding positively screams soul and gets right down inside our feelings, our hearts etc., whereas today's stuff just scrapes the surface of the human condition. I can't really speak for other forms of entertainment as music is my love, but will choose one film example - compare something like Midnight Cowboy from 1968 to Bridget Jones's Diary from the 1990s and I feel sure the difference would be immediately apparent. I'm not sure that the issue of money and producing rubbish just to cash in is the sole driving force behind today's entertainment, because I think that's how it's always been - well the money issue - but for some reason what the writers/artists etc. were offering back in previous times contained a depth which seems largely lacking today. It's odd that even the throwaway stuff from the past is still good, despite little thought probably having been put into its production. It's great for me to see someone of the younger generation having a consciousness about the lack of depth of a large part of what is available today for entertainment, and I feel that you will be very successful in your project. Good luck!! Incidentally and as an aside, I use YouTube a lot and have noticed huge numbers of younger people make comments on the clips of old music, old films etc., in the same vein as what you've said here, so maybe there is a huge hole in the market for something more solid to be produced in the entertainment world as if other young people are aware of it, then you've immediately got an audience.
• Southend-On-Sea, England
6 May 11
Thanks so much for the very interesting reply. Your ancestors sound as if they've given you a good grounding and it was similar with me...my father was an amateur musician and brought (back in the 1950s) a lot of blues, boogie, R&B and rock'n'roll into the house. Your tastes sound really good. I'm a fan of 1950s (and into the very early 1960s) doo-wopp...those voices were amazing. Recently (by the way, I'm a Brit) there have been lots of compilation CDs on sale over here of rare rock & roll and doo-wopp which never had been released over here before, and it's all wonderful stuff. I like all the things you mentioned your parents like, although am not too mad on most country. That sounds really comprehensive, you having had a dance teacher who introduced you to world music. As far as acting is concerned, I have many favourites from all eras, and love Dustin Hoffman, Bette Davis...the names escape me at the moment as I've not been up very long and not yet had coffee so my brain isn't working properly yet lol. Really appreciate your comment too and you sound as though you have your finger on the pulse. Wishing you all the best with everything that you do.
• Southend-On-Sea, England
6 May 11
Oooops had to give two Ps to doo-wopp otherwise with just one P it violated MyLot's language allowance lol.
@sswallace21 (1824)
• United States
5 May 11
Heart. I think people in today's society do everything for the almighty dollar. Many people don't do what their heart desires. They do things to make a good income. That being said, people really need to go for their dreams instead of money. Then the entertainment industry would be a lot better off.
@skydancer (2101)
• United States
5 May 11
Thanks for your response, and I agree. I remember in high school when I used to write stories and people would tell me, "We'll remember you when your movie becomes famous," and I would reply that I didn't want my work to be all commercial like that, with me having no control over what is done to it. Everyone thought I was crazy, explaining to me how that is what most creative people live for. But my work has always been too precious and therefore I have to produce everything myself. It does take longer, yes, but the end result is ultimately a better one and always closer to heart for me. Thanks again for your reply. Take heart.
5 May 11
I think too many people focus their time on Entertainment. Make your own entertainment and live the life you have to the fullest, don't follow the media crowd, be yourself and realise entertainment is anything you make of it.
@skydancer (2101)
• United States
6 May 11
I think you are correct. I am sometimes appalled at how dedicated people are to being a fan of whatever/whomever. I will admit that I do have my idols and sources of inspiration, but when it comes down to it I was never the "fangirl" type. I always dreamed of being a performer, so when I saw something, instead of becoming an instant fan, I wanted to learn how to do it myself... was always more of a doer than a watcher. I am asking this question because I am trying to find the best approach as I venture into producing my own work for my professional career. I will definitely be myself (I never liked the mainstream anyway), but I also value objective perspective. I think it's good to have input from people who haven't seen your work the millions of times from initial concept to finished product like you have or are not biased towards your particular style. It sometimes gives you a fresh eye and is sometimes even instrumental in catching flaws you may have missed. Even if they can't suggest anything worthwhile, it is still a help in finding your target audience. Thanks for your reply and for sharing your philosophy. It is most definitely a good one to follow.
• Philippines
5 May 11
I think that you are trying to say that the media today is lacking in substance. The techniques might improve, the technology might be helping in terms of telling the story of giving information faster than before or the media is now a tool for social integration. However, in the majority of today's entertainment, it is easily to substitute substance into anything that makes a ton of dollars at the shortest time possible. Which is logical for the entertainment industry. The industry sells itself to feed itself. It plays on society's bad points, adds a little drama here, there and everywhere, add exaggeration and sells it to the public like hot pancakes. They're not serving substance here, that's the news and current affairs' job. This only means one thing for me - change is not always for the better and change do not always signal progress(in substance, that is). there are some things worth hanging into even though they may be old and not exactly the 'in' thing.
@skydancer (2101)
• United States
6 May 11
You are right. The industry often does like to perpetuate all that is "wrong" with everything - even exaggerate it - as that seems to be what the general public is into. Everyone just seems to be addicted to drama and hearing about what's bad about other things and people... I guess with the daily pressures of always having to maintain or achieve a certain image for yourself, it helps some people in this overly competitive world to assure themselves that maybe their own lives aren't so bad after all. That last part of your post reminded me of a quote from Winston Churchill: "Do not let spacious plans for a new world divert your energies from saving what is left of the old."
5 May 11
Honestly, if you want to make money then the entertainment industry is fine just the way it is. But as for just being human and enjoying quality of great music, movies or entertainment I'll say that the modern music industry is missing soul, art, originality and ability to influence emotions in many ways. Almost every songs that hear has pretty much the same rhythm with the same story. I took humanities and jazz in college, when i heard the voice, sound and soul of the pioneers of today's music they had the power of moving my soul. Everything was so original, their vice so in tune. In tune with anger, happiness, love, bitter, which ever and they made. I watched Casablanca for the first time in college, it was a simple movie but wow the originality was amazing.
@skydancer (2101)
• United States
6 May 11
I can say right off the bat that I am not in it for the money (that's one of the choice I've made in this life!) You seem to have very good taste in this stuff - the old ways really can be best! Thanks for your input!