Have people not right to protest against corruption?
By Aaleexix
@Aaleexix (2290)
India
June 6, 2011 2:00am CST
Protest against correction is dominated severely......
What is it meant?
I think if protest is dominated then it indicated that correction is supported.
Who protest is not a matter of concern here but is it not the human right to protest against corruption. If any civil society id such democratic protest is dominated is not it indicated that state is leading to anarchy?
That is the latest social- political scenario of India.
If you are aware to the latest socio- political situation of India then you find that you can do anything in India but can't protest against corruption. It looks like from the central govt against to peaceful protest of baba Ramderv against corruption.
I am really confused why the politician fear to take step against corruption? In stead of doing any step against corruption when govt enforce themselves to shut the voice against corruption, what people left to do?
1 person likes this
6 responses
@aerous (13434)
• Philippines
6 Jun 11
Under Constitution of any countries of the World. There is a guaranteed bills of rights that must be followed. As far as I know is concern...laws regarding to that matter. People has the right to protest or file a case any public officials...who is involve in anomalous scandal...corruption and many other things which is against the law...
@aerous (13434)
• Philippines
8 Jun 11
I agree with you, friend. Corruption is against the law. But protest against them is not a way to punish them. It be better for us to file a case against public official which we know their activities of corruption.
The problem in that case. We can file a case but we must have a group to represent to initiate the filing of the case...We need also strong evidence to warrant the case. Because if there is no evidence or the evidence to be file is not sufficient. The charges will be denied...of even if the court accept it. The out comes will be dismiss...
@aimeedia2x (374)
• India
6 Jun 11
hmm. Today situation is worth. I dont support ramdev(without any reason). But i am with ramdev , and every1 with ramdev when he protest againt coruption. Voice is still strong. Protest is not over yet. Wait and watch a big change in india.
Anna and ramdev are still fighting. We are going to get a clean India soon.
Jai Hind.
@Aaleexix (2290)
• India
6 Jun 11
May not we support Ramdev..... But what Ramdev days in this matter is need to support. Who said is not a matter of concern but what is said is the matter. Govt try to subside the attention from the matter of concern. And probably succeed some extent. Need not to be a supporter of Ramdev but if any person raise any issue concerning public interested people need to be aware toward that matter.
Who is Ramdev is not a matter here. What the matter is what issue raised by Ramdev. May be Ramdev is not ideal person for all But the issue is vivid. Govt. try to make a concurrency to divert people's attention towards other issue from the issue raised. So people's awareness towards to central issue may make some difference.
@EdnaReyes (2622)
• Philippines
6 Jun 11
I think people have all the right to protest against corruption but I think it would be better to do something other than protesting. People can report corruptions and stop simple corruption they see around them. Action is better than words. Act and respond to the need, be vigilant, be an example that other people may follow.
@Aaleexix (2290)
• India
6 Jun 11
You are right here. But if the institution that rule the society prompt corruption by domination protest against corruption then what people's role against corruption. If protest against corruption is dominated by sate using state machinery, is it not an indication that govt is in support of corruption. That is the basic issue here. An peaceful protest by almost 1,00,000.00 people is dominated using police force. What it indicate?
@sentshan (40)
• Jamaica
8 Jun 11
Corruption on a whole is injust. people should have the right to protest about it. i am glad i live in a democratic country. i dont know if i could survive a day in india
