Sometime there is no justice

United States
October 1, 2011 4:51am CST
Several months ago, a woman jogging at daybreak was struck by a vehicle that kept going. She died at the scene. There were no witnesses. The jogger was well known in the community and this was the news of the day. Before the day was over, a young woman was arrested at her job at The State Capitol. This young woman came from a very wealthy and powerful family. Her father was an elected official in another state and the family had ties to some very high up and influential Republicans. What happened is that this young woman had been out all night partying and was driving home. The jogger was jogging across the street in the crosswalks. The driver ran the jogger down and kept going. She drove to a friend's house claiming that someone had been throwing rocks at her car. She left the car, which had noticeable damage, at the friend's house and the friend drove her to her job at The Capitol. Once the story broke, the friend realized that the car at his house was the one that police were seeking. He called police. They arrested the driver later that day at her job. Of course, she had the best attorney that money can buy. Yesterday, a Grand Jury returned an indictment of Failure To Stop and Render Aid. Nothing more. The driver was probably intoxicated but there were no witnesses to the accident. By the time that she was arrested, any alcohol or drugs was out of her system. So, I can understand that a Grand Jury could not indict her on DWI. But how about Involuntary Manslaughter? I am shocked and astonished, like others. that she was indicted only on Failure To Stop and Render Aid. She had to have known that she hit a human being and just kept going. It could be that if she had stopped and called for help, the victim might have survived. I do not believe that the victim died instantly. My memory is that she crawled for help and died on someone's front lawn. If the driver had come from a more ordinary family, I wonder if she would have been indicted on more serious charges.
2 responses
@bagarad (14283)
• Paso Robles, California
2 Oct 11
The wealthy and politically well connected often do get by with things that others probably wouldn't. The late Ted Kennedy is a case in point. Many people today do not remember Chappaquiddick, where Mary Jo Kopechne, killed July 18, 1969 after leaving a party with Senator Edward Kennedy. That night, Ted Kennedy drove his car off a bridge, and left the scene while Kopechne was still in the submerged vehicle. He did not call the police until the following morning, but he had made some other calls to his friends. For those too young to remember this incident, you can find out about it at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chappaquiddick_incident . Mr. Kennedy received only a suspended sentence for two months in jail for leaving the scene of an accident after causing injury. Could this possibly have anything to do with his being a well-known and rising Democrat Senator from a wealthy family? I find this interesting in light of another news story I read tonight where the owner of Coninental Resources is being prosecuted for a common sparrow-like bird being killed in an oil pit, and the penalty for that is a six-month jail sentence if there is a conviction. Something is not right about this.
@bagarad (14283)
• Paso Robles, California
2 Oct 11
I figured you'd know about it, but I put the link there for some of our younger and non-American friends who might have needed more information. Sometimes a prosecutor may be pretty sure someone is guilty but knows he doesn't have enough hard evidence to convict in a case. If he also knows he will be up against the best lawyers money can buy, he may go for a lesser charge than he'd like, just because he can at least prove that charge. Look at the case of O.J. Simpson. The jury has to reach a unanimous verdict to convict in a murder case, and if there are no witnesses and evidence is mostly circumstantial, all a good lawyer needs to do is make one or two jury members have a reasonable doubt.
@FickleSky (140)
• Philippines
1 Oct 11
That was terrible. I see here what a person's undisciplined behavior can cause another person's misery. If not because of her reckless driving, things would not have been that way. We should always remember that sometimes, our actions can definitely affect other people's lives.
1 person likes this
• United States
1 Oct 11
It may have not been just reckless driving. She may have been intoxicated or under the influence. Maybe, for some reason, she deliberately went at the jogger. Whatever, if she had just stopped and helped, the deceased might have survived. And now, it seems that the driver is going to get off fairly easy. Someone at work told me that she might get probation.