question about In Time

May 12, 2012 11:26am CST
This movie could be a good one.There are skillful and beautiful actors.And it has some good ideas attracted me a lot. But I am confused and feel hard to understand the end of the story.How and why do they consider it absolutely right to rob the banks and distribute the time which is also the money. They consider they are eliminating the polarization between the rich and the poor.But money is destined to be collected because there people love earning moneny while others prefer to consuming.So new rich and new poor will appear. The two heroes do a lot, disturb the social order but just will be fail to achieve the result they want.How do you think?
2 responses
@Bluedoll (17054)
• Canada
12 May 12
I got this and it could be wrong. Society is actually in good shape. People didn’t seem unhealthy or lacking a great deal except of course time which is of course now money. There could be an upset after the heist but I think the theme was there was an over abundance of time, way over abundant and the only reason to withhold it was to keep that indifference going at any cost. They leveled the playing field that’s all and gave people life. Besides most of the ones with too much time looked too bored.
• China
13 May 12
Different playing field are surely be leceled, Either artificially or naturally.
@ryanong (9694)
• Vietnam
13 May 12
All can be happens in movies, you know...