GQ Cover

United States
November 15, 2012 9:22am CST
So what does everyone think about Rihanna's nude photo on the latest issue of GQ?? My first reaction was "Does this girl EVER wear clothes???" Then I had to give her credit for pulling off such a racy move that actually looks artistic rather than nasty. She doesnt have an ounce of fat on her body and the photo is actually tasteful. In fact, Ive always wondered why slimmer women tend to get away with doing nude spreads and it's considered tasteful but more voluptious women are considered too hot or explicit. Is it because large breasts, hips, or butts scream sexuality???
3 responses
@MissBlack (357)
• United States
3 Feb 13
I hate to say this..I do but I compared her cover to the cover Beyonce (they seem to always be compared)did recently and I will say as a girl that it was tastefully was almost art..but I don't think she really even likes to wear clothes..people were going to buy the magazine and she was going to gain more popularity..mission accomplished..thicker (I hate the word..) women tend to always get picked apart when they lose a certain amount of clothes and I think its because right now, thicker women are considered 'the in thing' as opposed to skinnier girls..thicker girls are becoming more and more comfortable with ourselves so it is just going to come with the territory..someone like rihanna can strip and get put on a cover and everyone is drooling..let someone 60 pounds heavier do it and it might stir up all kinds of criticism..
@silverfox09 (4727)
• United States
15 Nov 12
I think she looks hot , I am not really surprise since most celebrity are doing that these days . I cant see anything private lol so its ok . She always looks great, I think slim just look healthy and more attractive for both men and woman .
@natliegleb (5184)
• India
15 Nov 12
that is because more people can easily view and get addicted to the photo and more importantly their fans will buy it ,and yes rihanna has a good physique