death penalty

United States
September 5, 2006 1:43pm CST
do you think a killer should be killed as in "aneye for an eye"?
7 responses
@kcrowson (354)
• United States
8 Sep 06
that is one decission I hope I never have to make. Judgement day will come on his/her last day.
@cyrux004 (949)
• India
6 Sep 06
All depends on circumstances. SOme do it for money, some for revenge, and some even for fun. Every case has a different stroy and need to be dealt differently
@slinger (35)
• United States
6 Sep 06
Oops,I meant exocutioner. However it's spelled. haha
@slinger (35)
• United States
6 Sep 06
No. It doesn't make the exocution or what have you, any better than the murderer. So what's the point? Just let the murderer sit in prison forever. :D
• United States
6 Sep 06
For some killers, I think it should be eye for an eye. I think once you kill someone, I dont believe they can just go to jail and do their time and come out and live like normal person. But there some exception like self defence and killed someone, and if this person is completely remorseful, he/she should get a second chance.
@DJBounce (84)
• Australia
6 Sep 06
Gandhi said, "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth only makes the world blind and toothless."
• United States
5 Sep 06
No i don't this solves nothing at all. No one ha the right to kill another human bing. What does it solve....