Would you buy a house if you knew it might flood?

@boiboing (13153)
Northampton, England
December 28, 2015 5:41am CST
The north of England has had a terrible few weeks for flooding. A couple of years ago, it hit badly in the south and my sister's home was uninhabitable. The village that she lives in was so badly flooded that one joker put up a sign under the village sign saying "Twinned with Atlantis". She took a year off work and went to live on her canal boat whilst the work was done and the house looks great again. They took some extra precautions in case it happens again - getting rid of the wooden flooring and putting down a stone floor that should survive better. Across the road from her is a house that has been up for sale for 9 months now. Down the road a few more are failing to sell. Nobody wants to buy in an area that has flooded. You can't really blame buyers for feeling that way. Meanwhile, my parents live in Salisbury, a beautiful old historic city with a 13th century cathedral. Ironically the cathedral was built on water meadows but has survived remarkably well considering although the land around it sometimes floods. My parents live opposite a large water meadows which regularly floods when the river is high. Land owners have submitted plans to build on those water meadows and the city has a very active 'Save the Water Meadows' campaign. Not only are they an area of beauty, they act as the 'overflow' for the city. When it rains, the water meadows do what they are supposed to do - they flood. If you build on them, it's inevitable that the new houses will flood. More annoyingly for those who live nearby, the flooding will spread because the new properties will reduce the land available to soak up the water so the flood area will be much enlarged. My parents should be fine - their place is a good few meters above the water meadows - but the whole area will be really badly impacted. My sister's house is well over a hundred years old. It was built at a time when it wouldn't have flooded. Developments in more recent years have caused the problems that led to her flooding. Why then would any city council consider allowing new building that's almost guaranteed to create problems? And why would anybody buy a house in a water meadow? If you are interested to know more about the campaign, you can see the Save the Meadows facebook page.
Save the Meadows - Salisbury, Salisbury, Wiltshire. 2,195 likes · 7 talking about this. SAVE THE MEADOWS! Your support is needed to stop development on...
20 people like this
18 responses
@PainsOnSlate (21854)
• Canada
28 Dec 15
We rented homes for years because we moved so often. Good friends bought a house they soon found out was in a flood area, they were not told about the flood problem. They walked away when they couldn't get their money back, let the bank know what was going on the the original owners had to take it back..We live on the side of a mountain. No flooding here. Someone was not thinking about safety when they built houses there, just money .
4 people like this
@fishtiger58 (29823)
• Momence, Illinois
29 Dec 15
Now why doesn't that surprise me, it's always about money.
1 person likes this
@kevin1877uk (36988)
28 Dec 15
It does make you wonder does it to why they do build there. I know I wouldn't buy.
2 people like this
@boiboing (13153)
• Northampton, England
28 Dec 15
I'm optimistic that the flooding this Christmas might make the council think again.
3 people like this
@kevin1877uk (36988)
28 Dec 15
@boiboing I hope it does make the council think again.
1 person likes this
• Preston, England
28 Dec 15
depends on the housing situation - if it was the only housing I could afford I might consider it
1 person likes this
@boiboing (13153)
• Northampton, England
29 Dec 15
This is a very good point. Not everybody has a choice and economics mean people buy houses in noisy, smelly, dangerous places all the time.
1 person likes this
@boiboing (13153)
• Northampton, England
29 Dec 15
@arthurchappell That was exactly what I was thinking of.
1 person likes this
@DWDavis (25807)
• Pikeville, North Carolina
28 Dec 15
The city will let them build in the flood plain because of the increased tax revenues they will be able to collect. The folks who live nearby who aren't currently being flooded need to carefully document the fact that they don't get flooded when the waters rise currently so that if the development of the water meadows occur and they do get flooded they might be able to bring action for damages against the city, the developers, and the land owner who sold the land for development.
2 people like this
@boiboing (13153)
• Northampton, England
28 Dec 15
I still believe that they will win this campaign.
1 person likes this
• United States
28 Dec 15
Why? Well it's greed of course. Whenever something illogical creates a question, the answer is often greed. And, no, I would not buy a house in a flood plain.
2 people like this
@fishtiger58 (29823)
• Momence, Illinois
29 Dec 15
Flood insurance is very expensive. If you live in the flood plains in Illinois you have to have flood insurance to even get a loan to buy a house. I would never buy a house in the flood plain.
2 people like this
@GardenGerty (157865)
• United States
1 Jan 16
There are so many geographical surveys that tell you if you are in a flood plain. If you are your insurance costs are usually prohibitive. The town I live in now had a seriously bad flood in 1951. A dam was built to prevent it from happening again. The downtown flooded during that flood. I, on the other hand, live on top of a high hill at the edge of town. It was not flooded at all even in 1951.
@scheng1 (24650)
• Singapore
28 Dec 15
If I have a job that is in the same area, I may buy a house there. I will buy the cheapest one and then tear it down to rebuild. It should at least be a few feet higher than the ground, and definitely not a piece of wood anywhere.
1 person likes this
• Hong Kong
28 Dec 15
Well, I am sure there's nobody who wants to buy a house like that unless he or she has very special reason to do so. It is not easy to live in an area like that as well. I think the movingto a better place to live will be a good idea.
1 person likes this
@LadyDuck (460346)
• Switzerland
28 Dec 15
This project is insane, the houses will be flooded every time that it rains a little more.
@LadyDuck (460346)
• Switzerland
28 Dec 15
@boiboing This happens all the time and then, when there are major disasters, there are "investigations". Ridiculous.
1 person likes this
@boiboing (13153)
• Northampton, England
28 Dec 15
It is but it's backed by some very wealthy land owners - the same people who have blocked every plan for a bypass for the city in the last few decades.
1 person likes this
@boiboing (13153)
• Northampton, England
28 Dec 15
@LadyDuck I'm not very biblical but I always remember the story about the fool who built his house on sand and think he was wiser than those who build on a flood plane.
1 person likes this
@bluesa (15023)
• Johannesburg, South Africa
28 Dec 15
I would definitely not buy a house where flooding is such a large possibility. And if new developments are the cause for it, it does not make sense for it to be allowed.
1 person likes this
@Poppylicious (11133)
28 Dec 15
We need to start building homes on stilts. I saw a meme 'thing' today which blamed the cutting down of trees, particularly oak trees which apparently gulp down oodles of water. We need to show some respect to nature or it will just fight back, because that's all it can do.
@boiboing (13153)
• Northampton, England
29 Dec 15
Stilts are something we were imagining but then they would still need raised roads. We were joking that they would be better putting house boats on the land.
@hiru84 (942)
• Malaysia
29 Dec 15
Sometimes these houses must cheaper than others. People buy them , because they haven't more money to spend for a house in better place. Land owners must solve this problem or people must report this.
1 person likes this
@Traceyjayne (1769)
• United Kingdom
28 Dec 15
I would not buy a house if there was a danger of it getting flooded. My family has back luck with water as it is ....
@boiboing (13153)
• Northampton, England
28 Dec 15
Sadly people buy houses in areas where there's a high chance of being burgled.
@gudheart (12659)
28 Dec 15
I wouldn't now considering how bad the weather has been recently.
@Jessicalynnt (50525)
• Centralia, Missouri
1 Jan 16
Build on stilts, or a floating house? lol
@paigea (35824)
• Canada
29 Dec 15
I would not want to buy in a flood plain. Of course it could happen if I werent' made aware of it.
@Scindhia (1906)
• India
29 Dec 15
We had a similar situation in Chennai, India recently. It was one of the worst disasters the area had seen in a century. The building development authorities had blindly authorized people to build in areas which were once upon a time, well known water resources. The continuous rains coupled with high water logging,scarcity of groceries and power shut down wreaked great havoc on the city. However steps are now being taken to rectify the previous mistakes. Eco-friendly projects is the need of the hour now. Consumers should also be aware of the problems and act accordingly.