Why is bra singular and panties plural?

November 24, 2006 2:10pm CST
should it be the other way round?
12 responses
@mariner68 (1276)
• India
30 Nov 06
thata a valid point, dude! bot i don't know. wud anybody clarify this?
30 Nov 06
Someone already did :P
@shrekk (561)
• Pakistan
24 Nov 06
I can't provide you with an anser, but i can provide you with a pic..! P.S. Maybe its because you look at panties from both sides but you look at a bra from the front only!!
28 Nov 06
Hmmmm there could be something in that! Still odd why they call it that!
@chukwudi (1098)
• Nigeria
28 Nov 06
it should be the other way round
@nickel1191 (2790)
• India
24 Nov 06
Thats confusing!!
26 Nov 06
indeed it is! :|
• United States
24 Nov 06
Who cares...Just add an 's'
25 Nov 06
Thats not the point :P must be a reason
@nowment (1757)
• United States
15 Feb 07
Bra is a shorten version of the original garment called brassiere the word Brassiere once meant Bodice. http://www.yaelf.com/aueFAQ/mifititzlingbrassir.shtml The word is attributed to Phillippe de Brassiere who was said to be Frenchmen who developed the modern bra. The reason for the word panties, as in pants, or pantaloons, and can be used as pantie or panties, plural or not.
@chukwudi (1098)
• Nigeria
28 Nov 06
they mean the same thing ,and the same job
• United States
28 Nov 06
I have no idea!!! I know I'm wrong when I say this and I always get corrected when I say it by my bf.... I always say Underwears....I know it's underwear...it it always comes out that way!
@carmat (2849)
• Canada
24 Nov 06
YOU MAKE A GOOD POINT, ALTHOUGH TECHNICALLY YOU HAVE TO BUT CHEEKS YOU ARE SHOVING INTO YOUR PANTIES SO MAYBE THAT WOULD BE THE REASON FOR THAT ONE.
• United States
24 Nov 06
Good question.
@atticus (1379)
• Italy
24 Nov 06
i don't know,it's not my motherlanguage...
@faran123 (197)
• Pakistan
24 Nov 06
i have no idea about this do u have? i think nobody have an idea about this?