A Plausible Conspiracy Theory about the Assassination of John F. Kennedy

Google Images
Laguna Woods, California
October 27, 2017 9:21pm CST
After living in Dallas, Texas for 25 years from the mid-1970s until 2000, I was a frequent visitor to the Kennedy 6th Floor Museum in the former Book Depository Building, and stood on many occasions on the Grassy Knoll, as well as other locations around Dealey Plaza, where Kennedy was shot. During those early years in Dallas, only a dozen or so years after Kennedy was assassinated, I frequently met people who had been at Dealey Plaza and witnessed the assassination, including some very reputable witnesses. They all swore that shots had been fired from the Grassy Knoll, as well as from the Book Depository Building. In the mid-1990s, I read a novel by Robert Tanenbaum who was deputy chief counsel on the U.S. House Select Committee on Assassinations and investigated the assassinations of JFK and MLK. The book I read was part of a fiction series he had written, but it came to the conclusion that a small group of rogue CIA agents had engineered the Kennedy assassination. These CIA agents had been trained to commit assassinations in foreign countries, including how to get local people to participate as a way to cover-up their actions. They had been sent to Cuba to assassinate Castro during the invasion of the Bay of Pigs. When Kennedy failed to send military support for the Bay of Pigs invaders, as they had been told to expect, they had to cancel their plans and escape hastily from the island. These agents resented that Kennedy had left them in such a precarious situation so, when Lee Harvey Oswald came to their attention, they thought he would be the perfect patsy for their plan to assassinate Kennedy in retaliation. They met with Oswald in Mexico City, helped him secure a job at the Book Depository Building, encouraged him to kill Kennedy and moved the process along. However, they did not rely on him to do it alone. They were on the Grassy Knoll and fired a couple of their own shots to make sure the deed was done. At the end of the book, Tanenbaum said that, although he had written it as a work of fiction, he had actually seen evidence which supported the incidents he described in the book. Considering that a number of documents regarding the Kennedy assassination have recently been released, but NOT ones which described what happened in Mexico City, nor any which answered the question of whether or not Oswald was working with the CIA, the Tanenbaum story seems even more likely. If you are interested in reading this novel about the Kennedy assassination yourself, here is more information about the book: "Corruption of Blood", by Robert K. Tanenbaum. 1995. "The author of 25 novels, Tanenbaum served in the late 1970s as deputy chief counsel on the U.S. House Select Committee on Assassinations to investigate the assassinations of JFK and MLK (where he determined that JFK’s death was the result of a conspiracy). This more than qualifies him to speculate about Mob connections, Russian spies, and CIA agents in this edgy legal novel, the sixth in the Butch Karp and Marlene Ciampi series."
14 people like this
12 responses
@JudyEv (326351)
• Rockingham, Australia
28 Oct 17
This does sound very plausible. There was a snippet on the news last night about how some documents had been released but not others.
5 people like this
@topffer (42156)
• France
28 Oct 17
Some documents are from the 1990's, and they can concern people who have not yet retired. They will be released in a few months, when the names will be hidden.
5 people like this
• Laguna Woods, California
28 Oct 17
@JudyEv - Yes, and the documents which were not released dealt with issues such as Oswald's connection to the CIA. I thought that lent even more credibility to this theory. It is all very interesting!
3 people like this
• Laguna Woods, California
28 Oct 17
@topffer - Yes, and it is possible that the CIA agents who were in contact with Oswald during the 1960s are still alive, too, and the CIA does not want them dragged into the conspiracy at this late date. There were a number of active investigations into the JFK assassination which were still going on in the 1990s. That is when Robert Tanenbaum, the author of the book I mentioned, was part of the investigation being held by the House of Representatives.
3 people like this
• Eugene, Oregon
28 Oct 17
I have never bought the story that Oswald was the (only) shooter, so this sounds plausible to me. The killings in 1968 of MLK and Bobby Kennedy were, it seems to me, far to simply explained away with single shooters, no accomplices, no conspiracy. These men sought real change in our society and there were and are powerful interests that do not want that change. One of those may be the dupe in the Oval Office today.
5 people like this
• Laguna Woods, California
28 Oct 17
@JamesHxstatic - Yes, you make good points about the killings of MLK and Bobby Kennedy. I think there is a lot which goes on in our government that will always be kept a secret. I particularly believed this theory put forth by Robert Tanenbaum about JFK because Tanenbaum actually had access to all the secret documents, unlike most of the other writers on the topic, and this is what he chose to put into his novel. I completely believe there was a conspiracy. I also believe the reason the CIA wanted to block the release of the final documents is because the CIA agents who were implicated in the assassination of Kennedy could still be alive.
2 people like this
@allen0187 (58444)
• Philippines
28 Oct 17
Thanks for posting this. Will look up the book. I have always thought that there was more than one shooter in the JFK assassination.
3 people like this
• Laguna Woods, California
29 Oct 17
@allen0187 - I have always believed there was more than one shooter, too. Even Oswald himself said he was a "patsy," which is someone who was framed for a crime by other people.
2 people like this
@allen0187 (58444)
• Philippines
29 Oct 17
@DeborahDiane some sectors in the government would have wanted JFK killed.
2 people like this
@FourWalls (62532)
• United States
28 Oct 17
I'm generally not a conspiracy theorist in terms of these outlandish things that some people come up with (e.g., Bush, who they also said was too dumb to tie his own shoes, was the mastermind behind 9/11; we never went to the moon, it was staged; etc.). However, I don't think Oswald shot Kennedy anymore than I think my putting coach (who was 16 days old when JFK was assassinated) shot Kennedy. If you go back and read the newspapers then you will see that UPI said the White House reported Kennedy was shot twice: once in the back of the head, and once in the throat. In fact, the November 24, 1963 Dallas Morning News had an interview with the ER doctor who talked about how bad throat wounds were. I've always said that if JFK had been shot in the neck he wouldn't be holding his throat when he comes back into view in that Zapruder 8 MM film.
3 people like this
• Laguna Woods, California
29 Oct 17
@FourWalls - You make some good points. I do not generally believe conspiracy theories, either, but this one does make sense to me and I feel that Robert Tanenbaum is very credible, especially since he was actually an assassination investigator for the U.S. House of Representatives. He had access to evidence we will never see.
2 people like this
@LadyDuck (459629)
• Switzerland
28 Oct 17
Thank you for mentioning this interesting book. Here in Europe nobody ever believed that only that mad man of Oswald had shot the President. I am sure that many documents have been destroyed and that we will never know the full story and the real truth.
3 people like this
• Laguna Woods, California
29 Oct 17
@LadyDuck - I think you are right. In fact, at the end of the Robert Tanenbaum book, he says that he saw evidence which supports his story, but he does not know what happened to it. It is very possible that it was destroyed to protect the CIA agents who had contact with Oswald. Tanenbaum is very credible, because he was actually part of the investigation held by the U.S. House of Representatives in the 1990s.
2 people like this
• Eugene, Oregon
28 Oct 17
I forgot to mention that the day JFK was shot was my first day in the army as a draftee, so that day is doubly significant to me.
2 people like this
• Eugene, Oregon
29 Oct 17
@DeborahDiane I was quite startled at this news. We had been issued uniforms and were standing in line for our first haircuts. There was a TV in the barber shop and as other recruits came out the news spread.
1 person likes this
• Laguna Woods, California
29 Oct 17
@JamesHxstatic - I think every American about our age has a clear memory of where they were when they heard Kennedy was shot. It was quite a shock. When I got home from school that day (I was a sophomore in high school), my mother was crying. I still remember that.
1 person likes this
• Laguna Woods, California
29 Oct 17
@JamesHxstatic - Wow! That was certainly a shocking day for you. I imagine you and your fellow draftees were in a bit of a daze that day! My first job was working during the summer as a typist at the Armed Forces Entrance and Examining Station in St. Louis is 1966 ... only a few years after this happened. I remembered that some of the draftees already seemed in a daze ... and they weren't going into the service on a day when the president was shot!
1 person likes this
@jstory07 (134740)
• Roseburg, Oregon
30 Oct 17
I will have to red that book.
1 person likes this
• Laguna Woods, California
30 Oct 17
@jstory07 - It is fascinating. I hope you enjoy it.
@nanette64 (20364)
• Fairfield, Texas
28 Oct 17
I believe to this day @DeborahDiane that J. Edgar Hoover (head of FBI) is who had the Kennedy's killed. He had a lot of power back in the day and when the Kennedy's took office, he thought he could tell them what to do and the Kennedy's told him to do his job and shut up. He didn't like it.
1 person likes this
• Laguna Woods, California
29 Oct 17
@nanette64 - That is a reasonable belief ... that J. Edgar Hoover was behind this. In fact, the documents which are not being released yet are both FBI and CIA documents. Undoubtedly, they are trying to protect some co-conspirators who may still be alive.
1 person likes this
@nanette64 (20364)
• Fairfield, Texas
29 Oct 17
@DeborahDiane Exactly my thought.
1 person likes this
@Deepizzaguy (95026)
• Lake Charles, Louisiana
28 Oct 17
There is no way that one person fired the shots that rubbed out the late John F. Kennedy based on the videos that are shown on television or on the internet.
1 person likes this
• Laguna Woods, California
30 Oct 17
@Deepizzaguy - I have always been skeptical that Lee Harvey Oswald worked alone. This theory makes a lot of sense to me!
• United States
31 Oct 17
It does sounds interesting. I really hope we'll get the real story on all this someday although I doubt we will - way too much government cover-up.
1 person likes this
@RubyHawk (99423)
• Atlanta, Georgia
30 Oct 17
I've never read this book but I have read about Oswald and the CIA. I don't know if we will ever learn the true story about the assignation of president Kennedy. I've heard a lot of different versions.
2 people like this
• Laguna Woods, California
30 Oct 17
@RubyHawk - I also think it is unlikely we will ever know the real truth ... at least not in our lifetimes!
@YrNemo (20261)
28 Oct 17
Glad to read this discussion. I have tried to find out more about this case, and often puzzled of why Kennedy was assassinated. That book you mentioned, the speculation does make sense somehow.
1 person likes this
• Laguna Woods, California
29 Oct 17
@YrNemo - I know that we will probably never know all the details, but this is a very credible theory and I respect Robert Tanenbaum, the author who put it forth after being part of the U.S. House of Representatives investigation.
1 person likes this
@YrNemo (20261)
29 Oct 17
1 person likes this