Was 911 a Saudi operation?

Northampton, England
February 11, 2018 9:14am CST
So was 911 a state funded attack by Saudi Arabia on the United States? The evidence is stacking up. I have never been convinced it was Al Qaeda and Bin Laden. I certainly don’t think the USA had much to do with it either, other than executing poor intelligence. I think the US killed Bin Laden for a reason as he would tell a very different story on his involvement in 911. I think he agreed with it and may have flirted with the plan but the size of the attack well out of his budget. I think he just wanted to take the credit for it. It certainly suited the United States that he did it as an attack on Saudi Arabia as revenge was just not possible for the US. Someone had to be punched in the face to show US strength to deter further Muslim Arab attack on America and Bush chose Afghanistan and then Iraq for that right hook and upper-cut combination. So why would Saudi attack America? For me they did it to remind the US and Britain of their special relationship. The Saudis sell cheap oil to America and make big billion dollar business deals there and in return they get to buy sophisticated US weapons to protect that oil and their borders, and 100% support in the House of Saud to undemocratically rule Saudi Arabia. But at the turn of the millennium British and American companies were beginning to expose world record corruption in Saudi Arabia with many foreign countries. What we didn’t know is our governments were not only allowing these corrupt deals but subsidising them with tax payers money, especially around weapons, over 6 billion dollars handed to Saudi Arabian royals for bribes in the last millennium. There are lot of those princes, around 2000. The crackdown by the West upset the royals and a message needed to be sent by some of them as the bribes dried up, 911. The hijackers on the planes involved in 911 were nearly all Saudis. The job was not contracted out so to stop leaks. Hijacker Al-Bayoumi received Saudi government funding for his stay in the US befoe 911 through a Saudi aviation services company called Dallah Alco. He was listed in FBI files well before the September 11 attacks as a Saudi agent (something the authorities in the Kingdom deny) and was a frequent visitor to the Kingdom’s Washington embassy and consulate in Los Angeles. Osama Basnan, another Saudi living in San Diego at the time, also spent time with the hijackers, al-Hamzi and al-Mihdhar. Basnan received around $75,000 from Princess Haifa bin Sultan, the wife of Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the Saudi ambassador to the US at the time of the Bush administration. The money was said to be for medical treatment for Basnan’s wife. Some of it went to Al-Bayoumi. As stories broke back in 2003 in post September 11 inquires, Basnan was conveniently arrested for visa fraud in August 2002 and deported two months later to Saudi Arabia. Ex NY Mayor Giuliani also made quite a claim. He said he was offered $10 million dollars to stop investigating the princess connectons, the day after it was revealed that the flight certificate of an al-Qaeda bombmaker named Ghassan Al-Sharbi, who had taken flying lessons for the September 11 mission, was found in an envelope stashed away at the Saudi embassy in Washington. It was pretty clear the conditions were there for ‘rogue’ Saudi princess to plot the attack to get the US back on side to return to the good old days of gold jumbo jets, London casinos and hookers in Vegas hotels, the very un-Islamic things the rich Saudi hypocrites get up to in the west whilst enforcing Sharia Law back home. The recent clamp down in Saudi Arabia that saw hundreds under house arrest may suggest the new king maybe wanting some of those bungs for himself. If some of those princesses are not happy with the new rules then we may have another 911.
3 people like this
4 responses
@topffer (42156)
• France
11 Feb 18
With all the declarations done by Bin Laden (to newspapers, by videos...) after the 9/11 I think he was approximately as innocent as Hitler. Saudi Arabia had several terrorists attacks from Al Qaeda, but it is true that their position is ambiguous, because the terrorism we have today has its roots in the wahabi islam widespread in this area and they cannot condemn their own religion or the way they act themselves (For example they have also destroyed a large part of their monuments on behalf of their religion and they apply the sharia law). It is also known that some Saudi funded this terrorism, but it does not prove that the state funded it.
1 person likes this
• Northampton, England
11 Feb 18
That was a 5 million dollar operation. No way Bin Ladens mob could fund it. If the Saudis did it then everyone would want to cover it up
1 person likes this
@topffer (42156)
• France
11 Feb 18
@thedevilinme It is perhaps a lot of money for you and me, but it was not for Bin Laden.The personal fortune of Bin Laden has been evaluated at 300 million dollars, and the Bin Laden Group, a family business, was weighting 5 billion dollars.
• Preston, England
12 Feb 18
There was undoubtedly Saudi upport for the 9/11 attack but to what extent needs to be carefully assertained
1 person likes this
@artemeis (4194)
• China
25 May
This was recently on YouTube so your take here.
Your browser isn’t supported anymore. Update it to get the best YouTube experience and our latest features. Learn moreRemind me later
@aureliah (24321)
• Kenya
12 Feb 18
This is some interesting news and I will follow to get more info. I dont like being behind the current events.