Sanjay Dutt
By altair_dip
@altair_dip (807)
India
December 1, 2006 11:07pm CST
Do u think Sanjay dutt has to be punished?Sanjay Dutt was arrested on April 19, 1993 for alleged involvement in the March 12, 1993 bombings of Mumbai.
Mumbai was engulfed in riots as the aftermath of the destruction of the Babri Masjid complex in Ayodhya in December 1992. The resulting riots claimed hundreds of lives and it is during this time that Sanjay Dutt claims to have asked his under world friends to provide him with a fire arm for protection. He however had not conveyed to police any threats to his life.
As per the CBI case filed in a TADA court Abu Salem and his men went to Dutt's house on January 16, 1993 and gave him three AK-56 rifles, 25 hand grenades, one 9 mm pistol and cartridges. He returned two AK-56 rifles, hand grenades and cartridges to Hanif Kadawala and Samir Hingora but kept one AK-56 rifle with himself.
Other alligations
In 2001 he was questioned by the Enforcement Directorate about alleged hawala deals in connection with the probe into the underworld-Bollywood nexus.[6] No charges were filed against the actor.
5 responses
@shi_2000_21 (2680)
• India
4 Dec 06
No one should be spared if found guilty for destroying the humanity, Even Sanjay Dutt. I am very much convinced from the first itself that sanjay dutt was somewhat involved in this bombing.
@siddhinfo (1500)
• India
4 Dec 06
Why not to punish? If as per the law if Sanjay Dutt is guilty he should get punishment. As it is said in the eyes of Law everyone is same and guilty has to punished. If he proves guilty and not punished than no one will trust and believe in law.
Law is powerful.
@Akash_skyline (32)
• India
2 Dec 06
Sanjay Dutt is certainly Guilty on the grounds of possession of arms.. but is he realy a criminal/ terroist?.. many a times celebraties are surrounded with lot of gossip..it is very difficult to assertain what the truth
