Did Nasa Land On The Moon.?
By tambdy
@tambdy (1967)
December 28, 2006 4:43pm CST
There is alot of evidence to suggest that the original moon landing was fake, even america experts have said it is fake.
What do you think.?
8 responses
@profcentral (719)
• Philippines
29 Dec 06
It is really intriguing actually. We have to be open minded regarding this, there are more and more evidences being exposed as to what really occured. If it were really faked, I wouldn't think NASA or the US governement for that matter announce it to the public. We have to gather all the facts and decide for ourselves if this really happened. As for now, I'm still on the neutral side waiting for more evidences and I have to be keen about this coz' there are many self confessed experts out there.
1 person likes this
@profcentral (719)
• Philippines
29 Dec 06
In addition to that, I wasn't born that time to really say that I've watched it being launched. There are still many things that could be proved and disproved in this time with all the new technologies being discovered.
@Phatmat (104)
• Australia
29 Dec 06
i think it is real. i know there are many people saying its fake, though there is not much reason to make up a whole fake conspiracy ... i mean NASA already has many things in space, some even more complex then landing on the moon. NASA has done so much, and why couldn't they do something as simple as landing on the moon?
1 person likes this
@lelenoise (189)
• Italy
29 Dec 06
I think the original moon landing was recreated in Hollywood and Louis Armstrong was an actor.
1 person likes this
@aizavel (558)
• Philippines
29 Dec 06
Yeah i have also watched that on exposed.. i am still haveing second thoughts, why do they fund it so badly and why did that billionare who wasa that again gave how many billions just to go the moon or is it just used to show that they have really landed the moon... well, but some do say it's fake don't know what to believe.. maybe if my eyes would really see the site or if i had been on the moon myself i'll have an answer
1 person likes this
@srhelmer (7029)
• Beaver Dam, Wisconsin
28 Dec 06
The only "evidence" is a bunch of web sites claiming to have experts.
When you factor in the number of people who would have to keep quiet about it throughout all these years, plus the cost of not only filming the first landing but 5 other ones, including the drama associated with Apollo 13, it would cost more to fake it and cover it up than actually send someone there.
1 person likes this
@sudhajan (1219)
• France
29 Dec 06
Not, it is a derivative of moon land, in actual fact no one can reach the moon. NASA reach moon, it was a plant but not a moon. Even now they sent two sat's to sun....are you believe they manage to reach the sun.
1) Because, your teacher teach you that there is a person reach the moon from NASA.
2) But my grand mother say that there is her grandma sit down in the moon, prepare dinner for me.
above two item which one is true?....you need marks to pass the exam. So you begin to believe the teacher....on the other hand my grandma want's me to take a dinner with full happiness. that she would like to say my dinner from the moon.
from the above two information, which you choose to predict to your teach.
My conclusion is that every thing can be done by human. why you want to predict the teacher that the NASA actually land on the moon. so don't think too much to predict the teacher....try to follow their instruction...once you reach as a scientist. Then you think toomuch like me......
Young scientist.