Do you agree that all political leaders should be put on an island??

@WebMann (4732)
Canada
January 6, 2007 9:33am CST
Maybe then they could fight it out among themselves without the need to kill millions of innocents. But no bombs or guns or knives of any sort. Just rocks and sticks because if they want to act like primatives they should be treated that way.
3 responses
@RAMPersona (2037)
• Philippines
6 Jan 07
yes, but i bet they'll take it as a vacation. maybe they'd just play strip poker, or do the spa thing, or sunbathing along the beach, anything relaxing. why? they have to no followers, subordinates to control, instead 2nd bananas will be in command.
1 person likes this
@WebMann (4732)
• Canada
6 Jan 07
Good thinking and I agree. Should have thought of that myself. Thanks Time for a new strategy. I will have to make sure that the conditions are just right so there is no way to enjoy it. :) Thanks for your post, enjoy the new year
@Darkwing (21590)
6 Jan 07
What would be the point in that, when the rest of the aggressors in the world are left to fight amongst themselves, with no legal control whatsoever. Also, if on an island without weapons, they would be very vulnerable and would be blown out of site by terrorists or extremists. No, I don't think they should be put on an island. Bad idea. I do think they should review their Peace Keeping papers though, and find a better, more peaceful way of sorting things out.
1 person likes this
@WebMann (4732)
• Canada
6 Jan 07
Well maybe while they were on the island they would stop sending their kids to war. They could look over the Peace Keeping papers there
@ezzrssi (11197)
• Italy
6 Jan 07
yes i do i agree