Windows OS are a piece of junk, when security is required. Do you agree?

January 17, 2007 11:05pm CST
Windows can never beat the security and robustness of LINUX. Share your views on which OS should be used when security is a matter of great concern.
3 responses
• India
21 Jan 07
LINUX is way ahead in temrs of security than windows. But the majority people specialise in windows. So even if you had a security problem, you cud blindly dial number and ask for help whereas with linux, you arent sure which number to dail or wat to do wen ur linux has some problem.
@flikkenni (540)
• Indonesia
21 Jan 07
I agree that windows operating system will become a trouble when you need security. They need more additional security like antivirus software and firewall software. I don't know why linux security are better than windows, maybe because there are many people used windows rather than linux so the hacker thinks that will be more benefit if they attack windows because it will be more easy than attack the security of linux.
@usman400 (1588)
• Pakistan
18 Jan 07
Yes , but at the same time LINUX simply cannot replace windows, infact Microsoft's monoply is still not in danger when compared to LINUX, there is no doubt LINUX is best in security but its not 100% secure so I am happy with windows !