Which is better

@pvsamrat (104)
India
January 19, 2007 9:36am CST
20-20 match 50 overs match
1 person likes this
8 responses
• India
20 Jan 07
ODI is a better version of cricket compared to 20-20.In 20-20 only power play matters.
1 person likes this
@Phlamingho (7831)
• Denmark
19 Jan 07
50 over is always better.
• India
20 Jan 07
y di u think so?
• India
21 Jan 07
i think 20-20 overs match is good
• India
20 Jan 07
in todays busy life i think 20-20 match is better.......in that match the firing batsman can also be seen......
@nrmrreddi (356)
• Germany
20 Jan 07
Accepting new form of games in Cricket is good but every one has its own importance. But i prefer 50 over match to 20-20. In 20-20 you see players just blasting from the word go, which will loose the class of the Cricket. Its happen the same in 50 over match but 20-20 makes it more worse. But playing such games is also good to be part of Cricket.
@puneet08 (102)
• India
20 Jan 07
50 over matches are far more bettewr than 20-20, as in 50 overs ODI , every player gets ample time to prove his mettle. He has enough time to settle down and perform accordingly. 20-20 is just like flash , no time to think just make runs at fast rate , no technique is requied . here real Cricket suffers the most .
• India
20 Jan 07
20-20 is just a matter of hitting each and every ball and its easy to do so. It has a lot of excitement but then it will be a game for batters only. 50-50 is a combination of class and use of mind and it belongs to both the batter as well as the bowler. so 50-50 is better than 20-20.
@radesh (694)
• India
19 Jan 07
in 20 20 cricket the exitment will be more and we dont waste much time as the match itself will get over within 3 hrs so i feel 20-20 is better..what is your opinion?