Which is better

ODI is a better version of cricket compared to 20-20.In 20-20 only power play matters.

50 over is always better.

i think 20-20 overs match is good

50 over matches are far more bettewr than 20-20, as in 50 overs ODI , every player gets ample time to prove his mettle. He has enough time to settle down and perform accordingly. 20-20 is just like flash , no time to think just make runs at fast rate , no technique is requied . here real Cricket suffers the most .

in todays busy life i think 20-20 match is better.......in that match the firing batsman can also be seen......

Accepting new form of games in Cricket is good but every one has its own importance. But i prefer 50 over match to 20-20. In 20-20 you see players just blasting from the word go, which will loose the class of the Cricket. Its happen the same in 50 over match but 20-20 makes it more worse. But playing such games is also good to be part of Cricket.

in 20 20 cricket the exitment will be more and we dont waste much time as the match itself will get over within 3 hrs so i feel 20-20 is better..what is your opinion?

20-20 is just a matter of hitting each and every ball and its easy to do so. It has a lot of excitement but then it will be a game for batters only. 50-50 is a combination of class and use of mind and it belongs to both the batter as well as the bowler. so 50-50 is better than 20-20.