February 15, 2007 2:17am CST
As every cycling fan knows, Lance Armstrong won 7 straight Tour de France editions. Whats your take on the accusations against him that he doped during those years. Was it possible that he did it without those performance enhancing agents? or was he just very prepared and focused on winning the tour as compared to everyone else.
1 person likes this
• United States
15 Feb 07
No matter what you do, there will ALWAYS be people who are jealous of your accomplishments. This is just human nature. Some of those people will make allegations whether they are supported by fact or not. My personal opinion is that Lance Armstrong was better prepared and more focused than the rest of the competition he faced. Does anyone else have an opinion on this subject?