if angels and demons will be a movie, do u still want tom hanks to play lead?
By ghurl5384
@ghurl5384 (121)
Philippines
February 16, 2007 2:48am CST
if they will make a movie for angels and demons, do you still want tom hanks to play the leading role as robert langdon? if not, then who do you think is best to play the role?
5 responses
@Theresaaiza (10487)
• Australia
14 Apr 10
Nobody does it better than Tom Hanks! I loved the movie, and I enjoyed the people I watched the movie with.
@ghurl5384 (121)
• Philippines
14 Apr 10
Hahaha, me too Sang, I enjoyed watching that movie with you and Ken. Although I hope you guys weren't intimidated by my spoilers or rantings when I compared it with the book. It's just so hard not to compare because when I read books, I imagine what it would be like when real. And mind you, I have a very colorful and wild imagination. :)
@Theresaaiza (10487)
• Australia
15 Apr 10
No I was not intimidated. I don't know with Ken, though.
Kidding.
Why, you were a big help! Askgeraldee.com! It actually clarified some absurd parts of the movie. It does pay, I guess, to read the novel first before watching the movie so at least we can compare both materials.
Kidding.
Why, you were a big help! Askgeraldee.com! It actually clarified some absurd parts of the movie. It does pay, I guess, to read the novel first before watching the movie so at least we can compare both materials.
@besthope44 (12123)
• India
9 Nov 10
He is excellent in his role, so no match to play this lead..he gives reality to the character.
@Quatrus (56)
• Belgium
21 Feb 07
I saw no problem with Tom Hanks as Robert Langdon, he didn't exactly fit the character that I had in mind while reading Da Vinci Code and Angels and Demons, but he did a pretty good job.
I wouldn't mind seeing him again in Angels and Demons, the movie.
