how do u think about Iran?

I don't agree with you. I don't like Almadinejad at all, and yet, why can't Iran have the civil nuclear? A lot of countries have this form of energy, so, why Iran not? I'm against every kind of nuclear, so, why don't we eliminate nuclear in every country? To me every country has the right to use nuclear energy.

I feel bad for iran right now I was the war would stop.

Why do you think the US should send soldiers to Iran..Are you from Iran..we have soldiers already in Iraq.

yes i agree with you.

iran is not being ruled by reason but by religion,and trying to bring god to sort out the mess that man has made in the name of religion has to be rectified before the rulers think that they are gods and help in destroying their countrymen,someone should show them reason

From my point of view, the actual terrorist is US... US had nuke... US had technology to create nuke bom... US also attack other country... Afghanistan, Iraq etc... Every country has right to develop their country, use every thing they had... Indonesia also have nucklear raktor for power generation... Why IRAN develop nucklear reaktor for power generation being accuse to develop WMD. US also accuse IRAQ had WMD, but untill now, they not find it. 11 Sept attact... Is't true Al-Qaeda behind all off this. Is't true Pentagon hit by plane? Untill now no evidance could relate Al-Qaeda behind all of this. I think... this is conspiracy of war... so, let US their soldiers for being kill to ensure to conspiracy successful.

The U.S. doesn't *have* any more soldiers to send to war. The ones in Iraq are two two and three tours of duty, and and the military is calling up reserve soldiers who are in their 40s and older. And the idea that bombing Iran's nuclear facility is an easy solution to the problem is wishful thinking. That will only start a wider war, with Iran attacking Iraq. Then the Iraqi and U.S. forces will have to fight an insurgency and an active war. There's too much wishful thinking in the U.S. administration. In 2002 the military predicted there would only be 5,000 U.S. troops left in Iraq at this point.

The US hasn't got enough soldiers to fight a war with Iran while also fighting in Iraq. They are struggling as it is with Iraq, with many soldiers on their third tour of duty. The only way they could find enough soldiers would be to bring back teh draft. My guess is that the American public would be horrified and refuse. Anyway, Iran's "threat" to the west might be as imaginary as Iraq's WMD. Even if they are developing a bomb, it's more than a decade away, and the only reason they want it is because the saw how Bush chose to invade weak Iraq, but not nuclear North Korea.

USA has no right to attack innocent Iranians who are using nuclear technology for peace and they are fully cooperating with IAEA. US should also bring its troops back from Iraq and Afghanistan and it should pay money to these countries for all the loss it gave to Iraq and Afghanistan by impossing a war on them! All the US soldiers should be brought into court of justice who have commited war crimes!

i am sure if you are right. but I don't want that happen. i don't like war.war kill people.

i don't really like to respond to this only to say that i wish the war would be over and people would stop killing eachother.

Yes, This is a need of time and save the mankind from nuke threats.

I don't agree with you. Bush administration is sure Iran wants to create atomic bomb, that's right. China, Pakistan, India, USA and other countries have atomic bomb. Why Bush administration wants to attack only Iran and not China or India or Pakistan? Why Pakistan can have atomic bomb and Iran not? Pakistan is an USA allied and Iran not. We must use diplomatic ways and not weapons.

If US send the soldiers to Iran, they will be trapped there like in Iraque. I'm sorry Bush is going to make the same mistake. I wish there weren't wars at all.

I don,t think that why u want US send soldiers there in Iran?Tell me one thing are u living US