Ah, The Beauty of Acceptance Speeches...

United States
February 26, 2007 2:54am CST
I must say, I have been very tempted (very, very tempted) to write my own acceptance speech, just for the sake of how many do's and don'ts there really was at the Oscar's. It probably would have been something like, "Yes, yes, I know I am positively glamorous dah-ling, an absolute gem. Let us all pause, and bask in the aura of my presence--a long pause and pose on stage--aren't I just amazing, really, you must know that there is no other like myself, my fabulously charming self (blah, blah, blah...somebody throw a tomato). Whenever a name is called, to accept an award, I really worry, for the sake of the person on that stage, because, they have no idea what they can do to themselves, specifically, dig themselves into a big black hole (that unfortunately does not swollow them up and put them, and us, out of our misery). It is sad, when they get cut off by the music, but, you would think that since they are mostly actors, they would have learned something from speech classes, such as keeping your speech under the allotted time frame (I think, well that is embarrassing, it means shut up, stop talking, and yet, you are still talking). There were a few speeches that were passable, and did not raise any red flags, but, there were others that were bordering on bad, bad, and beyond bad. Forrest Whittaker wrote a very moving and strong speech (near the end...it was a bit too strong). Jennifer Hudson, was not too bad, she got a bit carried away near the end also, but it was alright. I liked a few others, also. Al Gore gave a good speech, it is nice to see that he is well-liked, because if he had been president, who is to know what would have happened to his image (although, it can't get much worse than the president's image we have now). The rest of the speeches, I am trying to forget. Here is a link to some of the action (acceptance speeches also) that occurred at the Oscar's (aka Academy Awards, for those of us, that never knew they were the same thing). http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070226/ap_en_mo/oscars_133
3 people like this
8 responses
• United States
26 Feb 07
Why is this award ceremony called the Academy Awards and the Oscars? Anyway, I didn't watch it last night... but I know what you mean about acceptance speeches. Some people do just go on and on. And by now after being a part of so many award shows, actors should know by now how to limit their talking.. I saw on the internet that they did a new thing this year where they have a thank you cam. It records their thank you speeches and I think it's just to show on line so that way they won't have to show the whole thing on t.v.
2 people like this
• United States
26 Feb 07
Lol. That is interesting, I did not see that. I did just watch the news this morning, and I also read articles online. The thing about the name issue, is I was watching a program about the Oscars, a few years back, and they say, that it was the Academy Awards, but when they made the trophy, one of the lady's there (forgot who she is, someone who worked there), was saying how that trophy looked like her "oscar", I believe it was her deceased husband...and the name stuck.
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Feb 07
I know, it took me a while to figure it out...when I was younger, I did not know that it was not two different award shows.
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Feb 07
Oh I see.. so the trophy is called an Oscar.. that's nice they named it after her husband.. But they should make it more clear so everyone understands that.
@aidonia (4209)
• Greece
26 Feb 07
I didn't watch the Oscars I never do because from all these speeches+ the time different so here is after midnight and if you are half sleeping and you must listen all these speeches......I don't thing so.I saw the next day the names from the news and I liked see Forest Whitaker take an Oscar.I don't know why but I like this actor.My opinion is any actor took Oscar thinking....(ok probably I'll see myself again up here so lets I sit any more I can.)......and start the blah, blah, blah...Now for the end I want an Oscar too for all the time I spend trying read all your (speech) topic.I even open dictionary but I did it....LOL...You did nice work here just my English had the problem!!!!
2 people like this
@aidonia (4209)
• Greece
26 Feb 07
And believe me I 'll not lose one moment from my sleep for the Oscars.
3 people like this
• United States
26 Feb 07
Lol, thanks. I will put you as my number one nominee, and then perhaps, the Oscar winner. I agree with you, though, I was thinking about the people on the east coast, like New York, and I figured, they were probably all asleep...because by the time it ended in my home, it was almost 10:30...
2 people like this
@Willowlady (10658)
• United States
26 Feb 07
The Academy Awards was one we wanted to see since Ellen Degeneres was hosting. It ended up being a snorer. Some actors and actresses are educated and charming, others are basic people much like us that have made it big. Some are good with a crowd and others are not. What as Al Gore doing there? Not so sure he would have been that good as President. Anyway, there is no adultery going on in the map room or anywhere in the whitehouse by this president. That makes me feel better. They keep playing parts of the different speeches this morning on the news-type shows I listen and compute by. Jennifer Hudson was sweet.
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Feb 07
Lol. Al Gore's "Green Movie" won an award, and Melissa Etheridge had a song for the movie, so she also won an award for her song...and true, about the adultery thing, but, I have to disagree about the rest...loved Ellen there, though...she made it pretty interesting, because for a while, it was pretty banal.
@Willowlady (10658)
• United States
28 Feb 07
Thanks much for the information. I did not watch and so you were a good source of information along with the news type programs I listen to. We love Ellen anyway. Thanks for responding to me.
@Sawsen (793)
• United States
26 Feb 07
I didn't get to watch it last night because I was working on some homework. But even if I did get to, I don't think I would've been too interested. I'm not really a big fan of all these types of awards. I mean why should people waste an hour or more of their lives validating these people, when these people would probably never recognize us to begin with. I think it's all pointless. I'm not being pessimistic, but people tend to forget that they're humans and make mistakes. And unfortunately, what's sad about it is that when they do make a mistake, everyone judges them like they're monsters. They are human, in good and in bad times, so people shouldn't idolize or dehumanize them. And these award shows just want to make an already famous group of people more famous so people will continue to watch their actions. I'm actually against these shows because people think that it's the best thing to watch, and it isn't. I'd rather watch the news to see what's really going on in the world, then to sit and waste my time watching famous people just get more famous and make more money.
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Feb 07
Yes, it is a waste of time. It was about 3 hours long. And, I agree with you, I tend to not care personally about celebrities, because they are just like everyone else. There is nothing that makes them better than us, we all have things that we have done that is positive and we should receive an award for, but we hardly ever get that opportunity.
@dmillman (2273)
• United States
26 Feb 07
I don't watch awards shows because of this (and a few other things that I won't get into). IT's just too boring for me. If I really want to know who won what (if I even know who's in the running) I go online and look it up. I do remember that I used to watch awards shows and how much I started getting annoyed with them so I stopped. I totally agree that there should be a time limit on these speeches. Also, if the person knows that they've been nominated, why not prepare an acceptance speech, just in case they win? Wouldn't that make sense? That's it, it makes too much sense - hehehe. Let me know if the speeches start getting better, as I might decide to check out an award show here or there. Thanks for starting this discussion!!!
2 people like this
• United States
27 Feb 07
I hardly watch myself. However, I figured I might as well, since I had a few moments of "free-ness", and so I watched. I don't think that those award shows will ever be not boring, lol. And, a lot of people prepare speeches, and they are still lousy.
• United States
26 Feb 07
Well, last night's Oscars ceremny was way too long, but I enjoyed it for the most part. Some of the speeches were boring because they were people we didn'y know. They should cut out a lot of the lesser known awards-- the viewers really only want to see the stars! And poor Marty had to sit through nearly 4 hours before he finally got his award!
1 person likes this
• United States
27 Feb 07
I know, the whole event was tedious. However, it was not as bad as usual. except like you said, there were so many people that we just do not know. And yeah, Scorsese had a long wait...
@ArsonCuff (3114)
• United States
27 Feb 07
Awards - winners
The presenters had more awkward moments at the 79th Oscars the other night in my opinion...Clint Eastwood babbled all over himself
• United States
27 Feb 07
Yes, lol. That is true. There were others who did that too. Such as, when Ellen was saying that Penelope was from Mexico, lol, instead of Spain.
@sigma77 (5383)
• United States
26 Feb 07
Thanks for reminding me why I never watch award shows. I think they are so hokey. It is all a big act, well of course, they are actors. I might be tempted to throw a tomato at the TV.
1 person likes this
• United States
26 Feb 07
Lol...I thought for some reason, that this award show might be different, since Ellen was hosting, wasn't too be with her there, she did some funny things, but, yup, everything else was tomato worthy.