Hillary pushes "warless" world? Hey, war is a good thing!
@Radicalpatriot (665)
United States
March 2, 2007 6:14pm CST
So Hillary and her pals want a "warless" world. Not! Without war, ruthless dictators are never eliminated (Hitler, Mussolini, Saddam, Amin) and evil prevails over good. With war, evil can run but it can't hide, and is smoked out into the open to be destroyed. War is good, as long as you're not the country getting bombed!
2 people like this
4 responses
@Aussies2007 (5336)
• Australia
3 Mar 07
You don't have to worry about that.
As long as there is greed... there will be wars.
Greed is one of the main trait character which separate us from the animal specie. Animal wants just enough to survive. But there is no limitation to what we want. The more the better. It is a desease... and it's killing us everyday.
Greed is the cause of poverty... because we exploit the poor to get rich at their expense.
Remove greed... and you remove war and poverty.
How do you remove greed... I don't have the faintest idea. I better ask George Bush if he has a weapon for this.
@Radicalpatriot (665)
• United States
3 Mar 07
The surprising element here is that circumstances that lead to wars seem to have patterns that reverberate throughout history. It would appear that ending war would be relatively easily armed with information about the past. But wars tend to spiral out of control and, like a vast forest fire, wipe out the prior order to make room for the next. It is a bizarre and terrible rhythm that seems almost necessary for humanity to progress.
@Aussies2007 (5336)
• Australia
3 Mar 07
Actually... I think we have learned about history.
The reason we did not had a major war for 60 years is that America maintain a world order by stepping in and have a small war to prevent a bigger one.
You have a situation today... where our worse ennemy (Iran)... wants the right to build nuclear capacities. If we let them... we would have to live the rest of our life with that treat over our shoulders. And if Iran nuke some country... you are face with the mother of all wars.
What if Iran decide to invade Iraq... we object... and they say... stay out of it or I'll nuke you. What do you do... nuke them?
If you don't... then Afganistan is next. Before you know it... they hold the whole Middle East and start marching towards Europe. And the only way to stop them is to nuke them. Only now... you not dealing with just Iran... but the whole Middle East. It is Hitler all over again... only this time... he has an atom bomb.
@Radicalpatriot (665)
• United States
3 Mar 07
To be honest, if the current conflict is to be settled, a good portion of the Middle East will likely be laid waste. The question is, which form of Islam will be destroyed? The Shiites, which make up only 10 percent of the world's Muslims, currently have the upper hand in Iraq and have long been the majority in Iran. The Sunnis, whom the Americans attacked when they took out Saddam, are the vast 90 percent majority, including oil-bearing Saudi Arabia, whose militants authored 9/11. But most Sunni nations have stable relationships with the U.S. What to do? Attacking Iran will worsen the stability issue. Withdrawing from Iraq is an increasingly desirable option.
@ESKARENA1 (18261)
•
3 Mar 07
I thinki war is natural. Its natures way of culling the population. Unless a country is being bullied by a super power trying to shore up its own integrity, war is part of a developing country's atempts to stabelise its population, as third world fertility paterns far outstrip the economic resourses needed to feed a population. Sometimes, a war that wipes out millions of these surplus moths is a positive thing for the world as a whole. Blessed be
1 person likes this
@lauriefnp (5111)
• United States
3 Mar 07
Hillary is living in a dream world if she thinks that she is going to accomplish a "warless world". This has not been possible all throughout history, so why would it happen now, considering what is going on in the world? This is where her idealistic stupidity shines. If not for the war currently going on in Iraq, can you imagine the bigger picture? There likely could be another World War. America is trying to step up to the plate and promote some sense of order and peace in the world, and sometimes war is the only way to do this. If we step in and prevent Iran from making nuclear weapons and selling them to the world's terrorists, then we are doing the entire world a big favor. If it takes military action to accomplish this, then that's what needs to be done. These radical terrorist governments do not seem to respond well to peaceful negotiations, do they?
1 person likes this
@kathy77 (7486)
• Australia
3 Mar 07
Oh I do not believe that we are going to have a warless world anytime soon just look at the world today so many countries at war. yes evil cannot hide and so I hope that the leaders of the world can come to their senses and straighten this world out very soon before there is no more world here.
