Iraq is not Vietnam

@dickkell (403)
United States
March 5, 2007 11:14pm CST
I am SOOOOOOOOO tired of hearing this junk. The Iraq war is NOT Vietnam. I understand that Vietnam stigmatized a whole generation and radically transformed America, but Iraq isn't Vietnam. The most important difference is that we have an all volunteer army. No one, not one person, is serving in Iraq against their will. This all volunteer army is much more effective, better trained, and better equipped than at any other time in our history. Just look at the casualty stats. The entire Iraq war has barely equalled the worst week of Vietnam in American casualties. So why does everyone keep asking this question? The main reason, I believe, is because the kids of the vietnam protesters want something to protest. They want to be a part of the hip protest movement. But it just isn't really working this time. The real lesson of Vietnam is that if we are to fight a war, we must commit to fight and win that war. We lost in Vietnam because we didn't go there to win, just to fight the communist takeover. We are losing in Iraq because we have not committed enough troops to get the job done. The other lesson of Vietnam is that politicians can't wage war. We have the President in charge of the Generals, and the Generals in charge of the military. When congress starts acting like generals, setting war goals, targets, limitations, etc, the military is undermined. Congress is made up of politicians. Politicians think in 2 year cycles. Generals must think in 10-15 year cycles. You cannot overthrough a 50 year dictatorship and establish peace and prosperity in a 2 year cycle. We need to commit the troops necessary, give them the freedom necessary, and put our confidence in the highly qualified men and women who lead our armed forces to do their jobs. Iraq has actually, in the bigger scope of things, been a relatively successful war. We need to make some changes and get more aggressive with our forces and diplomacies to press forward to success, but we need to remember the good things we've done in Iraq also, back off, and let the professional army do the job we pay them to do.
2 people like this
2 responses
@tarsadawn (350)
• United States
6 Mar 07
I've enjoyed reading your view and agree with you. There are so many differences between the Iraq War and Vietnam. There is no draft with the Iraq/Afghanistan wars, there is a view that we can and probably will win in Iraq. I agree with all that you've said. I also think that it's hard for people to see the good that we've done in Iraq when all that is shown is the bad things. You never hear about the schools and hospitals that are opening, you never hear about the child who leads soldiers to an IED (risking danger to themselves), you never hear about the soldiers and their families sending care packages of clothing and school supplies to the Iraqi Children...all you hear is the bad things..the bombs, the mistakes, the deaths. I think if the media would promote more goodness, then maybe more people would get behind this war.
2 people like this
@BONOMBO (74)
• Greece
6 Mar 07
My friend i am from Greece Europe but my opinion is that when you cant persuade your soldiers to fight for winning how you can persuade the rest of the world that this war that you started it is for a good reason and the good of the iraqi people. You have a military that is thinking more for the money than the real war. You Americans i am convinced that if you fight for the save of your country you will win for sure but when your presidents is making you fight for unrealistic and stupid economic reasons you will always lose.
1 person likes this
@dickkell (403)
• United States
8 Mar 07
It's not the soldiers who aren't fighting to win, it's the politicians.
1 person likes this
• United States
11 Mar 07
Our military and soldiers have a mission at hand. They know their mission and they plan on completing their mission to great accord. It is not the military that decided to be sent there, it was our government who sent our military there.