Cricket

India
March 18, 2007 1:21am CST
India lacked agression on the field yesterday against banglades. Do you think Dravid as a captain is not agressive and Indian lost due to it. Was it a good choice to continue with bowlers who were thrashe all over the ground and why did it take for the captain to bring in shewag to bowl?? Is this becoz the captain is not agressive???
1 person likes this
5 responses
• India
22 Mar 07
well i think dravid is an agressive captain. it's just that he is not on the same level as ganguly. i mean, he is a good palyer but needs more time to improve his skills as a captain. his decision making can be sometimes frustrating. for example, during the bangladeshis game, it was evident that the spinners were doing well on that wicket, but dravid kept on bowling the pacers even after the power plays. he clearly didnt have any clue whatsoever when tamim iqbal was firing all cylinders. but with all due respect, as it is said - being the indian cricket team captain id the hardest job in the world, i think dravid is doing pretty well right now and will need the help and support of his entire team.
@jack914 (66)
• China
22 Mar 07
?i don't know how to respond the question . good wishes to you .
1 person likes this
• Sri Lanka
18 Mar 07
They definitely lacked aggression on the field but i dont think the whole blame should be on the Captain.. the body language and everything was very bad, they had accepted defeat from the time they started to bowl..
• India
18 Mar 07
if u r talking about aggressive than i think dravid is not aggressive, but its not always u blame captain whenever india loose. because i think 191 is not at all good target against bangladesh. it was our team's mistake the only man who was really concious was GANGULY.
1 person likes this
@pava1326 (130)
• India
22 Mar 07
yea india lack agressive but Dravid is a agressive captain. India took Banglades very lighty due to which it lost. None of the player play wirh responsibilty. when zaheer and patel can play why can't top oder.