what is better "to think" or "to know"

India
March 26, 2007 2:00am CST
what is better "to think" or "to know" for a particular thing . albert think that it better to think about a thing .what u think
2 people like this
4 responses
@nisha143 (93)
• India
20 May 07
hmm i think we have to think,because after thinking you can know about that matter clearly.
@jbrooks0127 (2326)
• United States
17 May 07
Because our perception of things is our reality I would say it is difficult to tell the difference. What you think you know may not be at all. If I thought for example that Hawaii was the only place on earth that would make a great vacation I would ignore all the other options because after all they couldn't be as great as Hawaii. We all are limited by what we think. And the older I get the more I know I know nothing at all.
@smkwan2007 (1037)
• Hong Kong
30 Mar 07
People in my city believe, you should something before you can think. I think this is quite true. Take a new born baby as an example. The first day they ever exists on the world, they have no idea of what is going on around them. How can they think. But once they get some concept of shapes, they experiment on putting different shap together, noe they are thinking. Only with some basis in mind, our brain may produce novel ideas. Please correct me if I am wrong.
@yanjiaren (9050)
26 Mar 07
Sometimes we think we know and this may limit us. But if we think about something it may extend our limits and we may reach beyond the boundaries of our own limited knowledge. I kinow that i don't know..is my philosophy..then i can always think and learn..if you see what i mean lol.