will America attack Iran?

@globur (206)
India
April 3, 2007 1:22am CST
America is planning to attack Iran. Is this point correct? Policy of America on Iran is going to a bad condition. America(USA) wants blood of Iranians. The USA took blood of Iraque,Afganistan etc. Now,they want Iran. For what? have they right to become a GLOBAL POLICE? why do they attack innocent people? why do they want war? IS WAR A SOLUTION? Can a war give peace? America wants to everybody to stop NEUCLEAR research and usages. WHY do not they ready to stop their own neuclear research? WHAT IS THEIR REAL NEED? They have their own internal problems. They want to skip oters` attention from their internal problems. They want resources. They want to spoil peace of other nations, because they have not real peace.
2 responses
@mickidmw (992)
• United States
3 Apr 07
This is even more wrong than Iraq! We need to just bring our troops home and let everyone else take care of themselves and deal with those that wrong us! Thats it thats all!
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
3 Apr 07
I think im going to disect this one on a statement by statement basis. First however i want to address the generalities of your post. Put into your context, ANY nation would seem evil, why does India attack innocent kashmiri's who only want independence? I dont understand the kashmir issue at all but do you see how easy it was for me to make a generalized statement and make India look like a war monger? This may not at all be the case but in one sentance, i was able to show the world how evil they look if you only look at these thoughtless kind of statements. I dont believe for one minute India is an evil nation. As for being the global police, it seems we cant win in this situation. We get blasted for putting a stop to Saddam's genocide in iraq but when we DON'T do anything in Darfur we are told we are ignoring the situation and should do something. We get driven out of solmalia so we won't look like war mongers when doing the job right there but we are then chastized for not doing anything in Rawanda. If more of the capable nations on earth would lend a hand in these situations perhaps we wouldnt have to. If not us, who? The only ones we dont ant having nukes are the ones who would be only too happy to give them to someone who would use them anywhere. No nation in modern times with these weapons is going to use them and we would like to keep it that way. Yeas, we used them once back in the days when they werent understood, biut it is also FACT that the one we used them on was going to do so to us, yes Japan had a nuclear weapon they developed with Germany. And does not Inida have the third largets nuclear arsenal in the world? Is not your leader a nuclear scientist himself? The blood spilled in Afgaistan was far from innocent. Simply put, they attacked us first. In iraq, IRAQI'S have killed more iraqi's than america has. And Saddam had killed more of his own people then we have in Afganistan or Iraq combined. No real peace in our nation? how would you know? have you lived here? Peace compared to "quiet" places such as nearly the entire continent of Africa? Peace as you find in India along the kashmir border? My friend, look in your own backyard before you start hurling critisizm at my country. You have demonstrated a great lack of understanding of my country in your post and I suggest you check your facts and form a solidly informed opinion before speaking for my country again.