Arsenal without Henry SUCKS!!!!!

I think Van Persie is quite good too. There were matches when Henry was not around, Arsenal played pretty well too.

Perhaps they can not afford to buy another striker ...:))
However, Arsenal is a great team, but it's time to Manchester United to rise and shine ...
Arsenal should make a few changes and buy some new players, or else they will never be on top again.

I think you are wrong on the matter that Arsenal do not play well without Henry. In fact they can manage quite well without Henry. It is just that it took the team a little more time than expected to get used to playing without Henry in the team. Plus Henry is not the only forward who is injured. Robin Van Persie and Theo Walcott are injured too. This is why I believe the goals have not been flowing as usual. Robin Van Persie and Henry had about twenty goals between them this season.
There are good signs of a recovery without Henry though. Rosicky and Fabregas have both scored in the past two games and I am hoping that the midfield is going to contribute more to Arsenal's goal tally in the future.

i agree that van peise is a good striker,but the injury always wrap him.And Aderbayor is still not good enough.I think arsenal should get Torres or Villar.

arsenal is most popular team,in my opinion.because of henry's pace,strong,rival hear fearsome and do nothing to him.in this tinm,football is easy quivered in the goal~~~go go

you are quite right. I feel Arsene Wenger needs to sign another good striker to assist Henry. Van Persie is Good, but look at what is happening now with him and Henry injured. The team lacks bite. Something needs to be done.