do you honestly think that the men of today will elect Hillary for president?

I have still met and heard many of men talking with chauvinistic attitudes that do not want or think women can run the country. It is still very much ignorant men and people in general out there who won't even give her a chance just because she is a female.

i hope you're right, thanks for the comment

i don't think it was so much she was getting stepped on by Bill Clinton as I think she was doing what any wife would do, she was standing by her husband in his time of need. Sometimes you have to put your differences aside and look at the bigger picture. You noticed they weren't together as much and still really aren't after his presidency was up. I think Hillary is a very brave, strong, and intelligent woman that could do a good job. I don't see no reason not to trust her and I for sure trust her more than I have ever trusted George W. Bush or any Bush for that matter.

There is a difference between standing together in tough times and being his doormat. He has no respect for her. She has no respect for herself. So why she I respect her.
You know the saying
No one will respect you if you do not respect yourself.

I still don't agree with you, you don't know what is going on in their relationship and it is very difficult to deal with affair issues as it is, especially when it is so much in the public eye. It might not be that she's being a doormat, she might feel as though if she's not giving it to him, he can get it from somewhere else. You sound like a very unforgiving person. do you mean to tell me that if you were married and your spouse cheated, you wouldn't try to work it out, you'd just toss them aside? that tells me that your feelings for that person wasn't as deep as you thought they were. I don't think she's being a doormat at all. I understand why she handled the situation the way she did. I think she handled it with class. I'm sure had she just walked away from him and moved on, it would've been people saying that she's not right for giving up on her marriage or not thinking about the child they have. People always have opinions about something someone else does in their lives. Unless you are a fly on their wall and know the extent of their marriage and what was being said. You don't have the right to call her a doormat. But that is your opinion.....Have a good day.

One affair. I could work with. I would be mad as hell but I would try to find out what was wrong with the relationship and try to fix it. But Bill has had several affairs with several women over the years. His affair with jennifer flowers lasted for years before anyone found out. He is a habitual cheat.
He knew what would happen to not only himself but also his family if it got out. He put the needs of his privates above the needs of his family. How could he put Hilary in a situation that humilated her in front of the whole world, not once, but several times. Because he doesn't care.Because he feels what he wants is more important than her. That is selfish and demeaning. She puts up with it. That is her choice. But I can not vote for someone who can not stand up for themselves man or woman. To demand that they be respect as a person.
Personally I do not agree with affairs. If you are not getting what you need in a relationship than you need to be honest with your partner and work things out. Communication is so important. IF you can not work things out then break up. Sense when is it ok to cheat and lie to your spouse?My problem with her is he has cheated sooooo many times. At some point you have stand up for yourself and say...hey, I am a person, I deserve repect, you can't do this to me.

"How could he put Hilary in a situation that humilated her in front of the whole world, not once, but several times. Because he doesn't care.Because he feels what he wants is more important than her. That is selfish and demeaning. She puts up with it. That is her choice. But I can not vote for someone who can not stand up for themselves man or woman. To demand that they be respect as a person."
While I agree with you on what you said, it leads me to a different perspective at the end. It would seem Mr.Clinton is a horrible partner, selfish & self-centered who put his needs ahead of his family. Ms. Clinton on the other hand, despite being humilated put the needs of her family (& her country) above her own.

You are right, whoever steps into that seat will have a huge mess and debt to clean up after Bush gets through playing president in the White House.

I agree with you, i think women do deal with certain issues better than men and i think she would be make a huge contribution if she were elected as president in making this country what it is suppose to be. The male president's of our time, have other countries and people hating Americans and America because of the decisions these men have made along the years in the White House and look where we are today. Lots of poverty, disease, social injustice still going on, unemployment. None of the men presidents too much think about the issues concerning this country itself. I think they focus their energy and funds more on foreign issues and policies.

so lets see what they can do! Although Hillary has no chance of winning..

lol...maybe not, but we will see

What ideals of hers do you not like? I think she has a lot of ideas about bettering the country as far as education, poverty, and things like that, what is wrong with her ideals.

Easier question asked than answered, lol. Where do I begin? I'll start with an overall socio-philisophical (is there such a word?)look at the matter. I am a big believer in small, non intrusive federal government. Simply put, I want them involved in as little of my life as possible. I don't feel a society needs to be regulate every aspect of ones life. I absolutely do not believe that the re-distribution of wealth is a healthy or even workable ecomnomical model in this country, nor should it be, it's not what we are about. I do not believe that socialized medicine is the answer to our health care costs. This goes hand in hand with the redistribution of wealth and the intrusion of government in personal matters. As big, expensive and bloated as our government is, do we really want to add that kind of component to our already redundant and overly bohemouth federal government? further more, as much as the government trips and stumbles over issues at times, are these really the people you want in charge of your health? Your children's health? And the more we depend on government, the more control they have over our lives, nothing from the government comes with out strings or huge costs. We pay enough in taxes and live by enough regulations. Do we reaslly need to increase it expontialy with something like this? Are we a nation of people who is ready to give that much of our lives and freedoms to a government. People talk about how the eveil bush adminstration has eroded freedoms right before our eyes, but what frighteningly little see, is that by adding social program after social program, healthcare plans, regulations, some too rediculous to even mention, more political correctness enforcement than actual livable societal regulation, by taking money from those evil rich people and giving it back to the poor, we will quietly and inevitably have turned our lives and freedoms over to government in a bigger way than we could ever imagined by simply looking at the the short term "sounds nice" ideals instead of what it really implies. I've wafted on enough here i guess, though lol. sorry. As far as other issues, Iraq, maybe we shouldnt have gone, but were there, get over it and finish the job. Besides, she saw the same thing everyone else did and came to the same conclusions, as did the previous congress, 3 presidents, the intelligence agency of many nations and came to the same conclusions everyone else did. I don't think she should apologize for her vote, and the one thing I do respect her for is not backtracking and apologizing for doing what she thought was genuinely right for our nation at that time. Everything else is far beyong the limits of this thread, suffice it to say, she is just not what I want representing our nation. She would be a great european leader, but she is not by any definitin, the type of leader I want in that whitehouse.

related resource: personal care

Thank you for your opinion and your response.

Yes this country is still run by men. I'm not saying I've sat down and listened to everyone's points of views or debates, but from what I seen so far I think Hillary is on the right track. Maybe this country still doesn't have the mentality to look past someone's gender and look at the bigger picture which is bettering this country. thanks for your response.

did no one read my last post? run by men? Look at the over all government picture in this country again. PLENTY of women in government in ALL areas.

http://womenincongress.house.gov/
this is just the congress alone
241 women have served in congress.

It is sad, but oh so true. I have heard many people say they would not vote for her, but I think she is a very strong and caring person and maybe she would be able to fix some of these issues concerning the United States itself and not problems overseas with a little more compassion than our previous war-happy president. It's just a thought. Thanks for your response.

If she doesn't get to the White House,she can still make a huge difference in the Senate. It is sad but the real power these days may lie in Congress, not the White House.So Hillary can, like Senator Kennedy before her,stay in the Senate and make a difference.

I hope that is true, i think some things need to change soon before it is too late. Thanks for your response.