Get DSLR with Integrated Vibration Reduction or Vibration Reduction on the Lens?  

I have very little experience with either. However, I did find an interesting forum discussion on Photo.net You can read it here: http://photo.net/casual-c...

Basically what I'm understanding is that quality wise there isn't much difference at all.

I personally don't use either, and I haven't had any problems at all with camera shake. In good lighting situations, I can use a 300mm lens handheld and have very crisp, clear images. In situations with less lighting, I just use a tripod.

Well, you said it yourself, it would be more expensive if you would purchase lenses with vibration reduction compared to a body that already has vibration reduction and could accommodate a variety of lenses. That's just on being practical on expenses but, if vibration reduction on lenses grants you better photos, and your really into that convenience, you might as well have enough money to purchase lenses that have vibration reduction.