do you think Daniel Radcliffe is too old to be Harry Potter?

no. i don't think he is. he was asked this question in an episode of Ellen de Generes and he also doesn't think that he is. it was an issue and thank goodness it's been resolved. he thanks his mom for the genes he has because it didn't make him look like his age, allowing him to keep the part in the movie.^^

I think that switching actors now would be a huge mistake. He has done a great job with character development so far and personally I don't think he's too old to play the part. I think that there's a contract that he's to play the character through the end of the series but that was something that I read online. So far he has really impressed me with his character growth and ability to pull off the Potter character convincingly.

I think that's absurd. Harry is nearly 17 by the end of the Half Blood Prince so he should look more mature than he did in the Sorcerer's Stone. Granted with the filming and release schedules, Daniel is aging faster than Harry (he'll be 20 a week after the release of Half Blood Prince) but I'm 28 and still get ID'd to buy cigarettes!!

Of course the promo shots from Equus that were plastered all over the internet didn't help with the "is he too mature?" nonsense but what he does in his off time is of little consequence to me.

no way! Daniel Radcliffe isn't that much older than Harry Potter. I think a couple years isn't that big of a deal. Plus, dan is just harry potter. no one else could do it, he's had the part too long. another actor playing harry potter just wouldn't feel right at all.

I do not think that Daniel looks too old to portray Harry Potter. Several overage actors have pulled off teen roles. Look at Ralph Macchio (Daniel LaRusso in the Karate Kid series) or Michael J. Fox. Both managed to play teens into their mid 20s.

Even if Daniel began showing his age, it is appropriate to see Harry aging. How old would you look if a maniac had nearly killed you several times and you had all sorts of rogue magics worked on your body? I think I would look a bit worn down as well!

NO,nobody would be more suitable than Dan to be Harry Potter, How can you imagine another feature of Harry Potter after You have seen Dan's on screen for nearly ten years?Just imagine, Dan has impressed you all so strongly.you can understand if another totally different guy to be Harry,how extraodinary it will be.
Just like Harry, Dan is growing up like every adolescent,like all of us.So how can he be too old to be Harry? Harry is gonna to be a man, and Dan is, too, Harry is "Harry", unless the director can find another boy which is going to be a man with the same complexion of Dan's, Dan will definitedly be the one who can be Harry all over the world.
Dan's Harry is not only a role,but a real person in the magic world and in the fans' deep hearts.

nah, daniel will be alright. Warner Bros can make him younger with an airbursh after. in some of the harry potters, don't you see he looks way young then old, then young during the long time filming the movie:))

I would prefer that Daniel Radcliffe continue to act as Harry Potter since its hard to
imagine another actor as Harry Potter as ive already grown used to Daniel Radcliffe being
Harry Potter so it would be weird having another actor to take his place. It would also
kidna ruin the movie since i just arnt able to imagine anyone else being it..well i could
i guess but id prefer Daniel Radcliffe to stay Harry Potter.