So being a former baseball star means he'd be a good senator?

@ersmommy1 (12587)
United States
September 9, 2009 10:38am CST
I am confused. No where in this article does it list his qualifications for the Kennedy senate seat. The only thing this says is that he supported republicans in the past. How does that make a person a good candidate? Regardless of your political views ( not out to start arguments) someone explain this one to me.. I don't get it. http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/09/08/first-on-the-ticker-mccain-told-schilling-to-run-for-kennedy-seat/
1 person likes this
3 responses
@mtdewgurl74 (18151)
• United States
10 Sep 09
I guess it wouldn't be no different then actors/actresses or wrestlers becoming governors and mayors. But I don't know why McCain is telling someone with no experience to run for..maybe he is wanting him to be a puppet for him..to maybe be able to control him? I don't know..
@coffeebreak (17797)
• United States
10 Sep 09
Not sure what you are talking about...saw a headline, but didn't care about it. But you know what... maybe that is what the legislature needs...members that weren't raised on the excessive, political family legacy. Maybe a common ordinary, hardworking, "main street" kind of person is what we need in the senate. His head would sure be much clearer, he'd have no strings attached, and not in cahoots with anyone else....I say give him a chance! Lord knows he couldnt possibly do any worse than what is in there now! Lately all the current "leaders" have been doing is cheating on their wives so, don't see how a baseball player could do any worse!
@pjsr18 (340)
• Philippines
9 Sep 09
Nope, that falls under fallacy "non-sequitur" or it does not follow. It does not follow that if he's a good baseball star, he would be a good leader. Being a baseball super star has no connections to being a good senator.