God's Support For Small Government
By gewcew23
@gewcew23 (8007)
United States
October 7, 2009 7:50pm CST
When the children of Israel left Egypt and conquered the Promise Land they did not create a kingdom as every country at that time but a loose confederations of 12 tribes. This seemed to be the best for the children of Israel, but God did give his prized creation free will. From first Samuel chapter 8 the tribal elders confront the prophet Samuel demanding a king. Samuel approached God with the request for a king, God responded by telling Samuel to give them the king if that is what they really wanted, but to warn them of the great price of centralized government. Samuel warns the people that a king would mean several things: involuntary military conscription (v. 11-12); daughters taken into domestic servitude (v. 13); claims of imminent domain over the best fields and crops of the nation (v. 14); involuntary taxation to support his army and servants (v. 15); conscription of the best servants to serve the king (v. 16); and finally, slavery of all the people through increased taxation taken by force (v. 17). A final warning was issued: And in that day you will cry out because of your king, whom you have chosen for yourselves, but the Lord will not answer you in that day (I Samuel 8:18 ). The prophet Samuel tells the people that keeping the leadership local and intentionally small is much better than allowing a central authority to have control over the land and the people. The people would not be persuaded by the small government argument, and pushed Samuel, saying “But there shall be a king over us, that we may be like the rest of the nations, and that our king may judge us and go out to fight our battles” (I Samuel 8:19-20)
Any of this sound familiar?
2 responses
@Sweetchariot (1718)
• United States
8 Oct 09
I agree with what you are saying, however, without a king, and leaving the tribal leaders in power, it would've certainly come down to the same thing...in time, they too would've become egotistical, and power hungry for what they wanted in their tribe - they would've seen the other tribes and what they had, and there would've been competition between each other.They would've made laws within their tribe, laws that their people wouldn't have been in total agreement with either. There would have been battles amongst the 12 tribes as well. Why...because the bottom line is they are human, and would've, eventually, ruled their tribes without the guidance of God. The more power you have, the more power hungry you become, forgetting who the actual ultimate leader is...GOD. That's what human beings do.
1 person likes this
@6_Torch_Burn (108)
• United States
8 Oct 09
Yes it does sound familiar!
One thing that many people do not understand is the true freedom that God gives a person. You cannot have that freedom with an earthly ruler.
So what did God do? Well you've heard the phrase (I assume) 'Moses and the prophets'(Luke ch 16). That phrase tells the story of how God ruled man before and after Saul. You see Moses and Abraham got their orders straight from God. After Saul and the other kings were set up, God used the prophets to help keep the kings in line.
Sound familiar? You bet. But the major difference now is that any and all creedance is being taken away from Gods people and given to the 'king'.
Mankind took a step away from God by selecting a king, it seem now that manking is trying to run away faster then ever.
1 person likes this


