waiting for the hangman  |
|
this is a tricky one to lay out without offending people. anyway two things first of all – this is not a discussion about whether the death penalty is right or wrong in itself and secondly is not a go at america (this should be clear but just in case...)
I have been involved with the human rights organisation amnesty international for about 10 years, generally just joining their letter writing campaigns. they only ask you to do this for countries other than your own (for in some cases very obvious reasons) and while most of them involved countries you would expect to have human rights abuses there were, and still are, a number about death row in the united states. there seem to be a fair number of miscarriages of justice that end up with someone who probably is not guilty ending up here, not to mention the whole thing of making someone wait decades knowing they will be executed at the end of it - which seems pretty nasty to me.
so if your country does have the death penalty do you think it is being implemented properly or is it leading to human rights abuses? [will reiterate that the question of whether the death penalty is right or wrong has been covered in other discussions]
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Hatley (21672) | 2 months ago | hi blue bunny Yes I believe the US still has the death penalty and I have heard that a lot of times those on death row are there for a long time. to me this is abuse of human rights. If that person is indeed guilty of a crime so heinous that he or she must die, do the death immediately not wait years. Also we should be super sure that we have the guilty party before condemning them to death. I hate it when someone is imprisoned unjustly and has to take forever to get anyone to believe that they are innocent.
| |
| |
|
|
jb78000 (1864) | 2 months ago | in some of the cases i heard about the person was eventually found innocent - after them and their family thinking they were going to be executed for many years. what particularly shocking about some of these is that they were convicted in the first place without any proper evidence.
| |
|
|
mommaj (1084) | 2 months ago | You are talking about criminal cases before DNA evidence. You are talking about cases that were before 1990. Yes, some people were wrongly accused and convicted. Luckily for those people, they did have to wait before dying because there is now evidence to prove or disprove their innocence or guilt. Now that DNA is a big factor in almost every case maybe the executions can be quicker. That sure would save the taxpayers money.
| |
|
|
|
Obama Urges Homeowners to Refinance ($90,000 Refinance under $489/mo) See Rates - No Credit Check Needed. www.LowerMyBills.com | add comment |
|
|
|
2. dawnald (10183) | 2 months ago | I don't think it's being implemented "properly" at all. In the states that do have it, people go through appeal after appeal after appeal and sit in prison for 20+ years, maybe even die in prison. Other states employ the death penalty far too liberally and carry it out too quickly. And there are statistics showing that people from certain ethnic groups are far more likely to end up on death row than others. And then there's the issue of wrong convictions...
| |
| |
|
|
jb78000 (1864) | 2 months ago | all of that is awful. at the very least proper appeals should be done and done quickly - there is no reason to subject someone to 20 years of waiting or what you said about it being implemented too quickly by what i would guess are courts a bit on the kangaroo side.
| |
|
|
dawnald (10183) | 2 months ago | Some courts are. Some police and prosecutors come to a conclusion and only look at the evidence that supports their conclusion. Some are just flat out prejudiced. And people make mistakes.
| |
|
|
|
Obama Backs Auto Insurance Regulation Drivers Pay $44/mo on Avg for Car Insurance. Are you paying too much? Auto-Insurance-Experts.com | add comment |
|
|
|
3. xfahctor (5573) | 2 months ago | While we do have a death penealty in capitol federal crimes, as far as state law goes, each state sets it's own standards in htis. Some states do not have the death penalty, some use it often and others use it rarely and only with very limited cases. For example, my state does have it, but only for narrowly defined cases. Since 1939, we have only executed 1 person, that was in 2008. Our legislature last year had drafted a bill that would have abolished it in the state altogether, but Governor John Lynch(D), vetoed the bill when it came to his desk and there ws not enough support in the state senate to over ride the veto. I can only speak to how it is handled in my state really. It seems that death penaltiy cases over all these days are executed (ok...pun sort of intended) with very carefull measure, what with the advancement of DNA evidence, forensics capabilities today, and such. Has an innocent person been executed in recent times? It's likely it has happened. I would say it is probably the extremely rare exception though. I am not really all for having a person sit on death row for years. Though often that is the result of the very lengthy and thourogh appeals process in place in the various states that have it and in the federal justice system rather than merely waiting in line for your turn.
| |
| |
|
|
jb78000 (1864) | 2 months ago | your state doesn't sound too bad considering. i know that the reason for the long waits is in part the appeals process but i did find it fairly shocking that several people (that i've heard of) who were convicted on clearly very shaky evidence had to wait decades before being found innocent - however thorough you are it does not take that long.
| |
|
|
xfahctor (5573) | 2 months ago | Honestly, if I was on death row, I would want it to take that long, especialy if I was convicted on shakey evidence. A side note to add to this by the way. In death penalty cases it is by jury that the penalty is decided as a seperate court proceedure. A jury can convict a person of a crime...but still turn in a no death penalty ruling.
| |
|
|
jb78000 (1864) | 2 months ago | i would certainly want the appeals to be done properly. anyway sometimes there appear to have been people executed anyway on the basis of flimsy evidence.
| |
|
|
|
Windows Registry Cleaner Leading Windows Registry Cleaner. Free, Safe Registry Scan. www.pctools.com | add comment |
|
|
|
4. JodiLynn (522) | 2 months ago | Personally, I think any and all DNA must be retested with advance technologies used to either confirm or deny culpability. I am pro-death penalty in cases of definitive guilt, confession should not be the get out of the chair free card. Without a doubt there have been abuses. DNA testing could eliminate much of that, IMO.
| |
| |
|
|
jb78000 (1864) | 2 months ago | i'm not sure how much - why do you think it would make such a difference? btw this is not about whether you are for or against the death penalty.
| |
|
|
|
Online Degrees Get Your AA, BA, Masters or PhD at a Top Online School. Start Now. Education.Nextag.com/Online-Degrees | add comment |
|
|
|
5. sunny68 (731) | 2 months ago | the gap between the final verdict and executing the verdict can be very huge especially in case of capital punishment. the thought of it can certainly be more tormenting than the act itself. here in India some cases are implemented immediately but there are also some cases which are dragged indefinitely. no offense but i don't consider this as an abuse. pronouncing such a verdict itself tells of the gravity of the crime, so the wait may as well be well deserved. as regards innocent people being executed, there is always a possibility. but here the status of the country matters. for example if someone is executed in China or Iran...you may sense foul play. but if someone is executed in US or India...you can be assured that the lawyers must have made the best efforts to save the convict.
| |
| |
|
|
jb78000 (1864) | 2 months ago | not always sunny - there have definitely been miscarriages of justice in the us although i don't know too much about the situation in india.
| |
|
|
sunny68 (731) | 2 months ago | i did mention that there is always a possibility. perhaps more dastardly acts are those as in China where organs of such convicts are sold or as in Iran where convicted girls are physically abused before execution just because Islam forbids execution of 'unmarried' girls. these are the acts that really should be condemned.
| |
|
|
jb78000 (1864) | 2 months ago | these are among the countries i included when i referred to countries that you would expect to have human rights abuses
| |
|
|
sunny68 (731) | 2 months ago | unfortunately the problem is that nothing much can be done in this regard...
| |
|
|
jb78000 (1864) | 2 months ago | some organisations do what they can - but you are right, it is easier to get changes made in other countries.
| |
|
|
|
Top Online School Degrees Earn Your Degree from a Top School Online! Study at Home or Anywhere. CollegeDegreeNetwork.com/Schools | add comment |
|
|
|
6. wmraul (581) | 2 months ago | This post contains content of a mature nature. You must be Signed in or Registered to have the option to view this content.
| |
| |
|
|
jb78000 (1864) | 2 months ago | what about people that did not do these things getting punished as if they had? again sorry but this is not about whether you are for or against the death penalty. (there's lots of discussions where that has been discussed at length, i think there were two new ones on it yesterday)
| |
|
|
wmraul (581) | 2 months ago | If you re-read my answer, you will see I have stated clear I reff to certain illegalities, which - in this raw form - mean include the fact is proved.
Else, I agree there are some innocents behind bars, but as well there are some guilties outthere .. And none of this 2 are not at all ok ..
Anyway, the errors are not in any way related to availability of a death penalty. People were convicted to long time (or life) while innocent/ have been found not guilty while clearly guilty - even if death penalty was not a punishment option.
My 2 cents ..
| |
|
|
jb78000 (1864) | 2 months ago | wmraul, i did read your answer carefully...which is something i rarely do. anyway the point i think you are now trying to make about justice is reasonable.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
7. cloudwatcher (3491) | 2 months ago | We do not have the death penalty in Australia and I have expressed my thoughts on that in other discussions.
Is it implemented properly where it is in force? Well, I can't answer for everywhere, but I know it isn't in most places and presume it is pretty much the same everywhere.
My opinions: (where it is in place)
# It should be the maximum penalty for certain crimes, where there is NO DOUBT about the person's guilt. That is, there is irrefutable evidence, or the crime being witnessed by reliable witnesses or camera, or caught in the act and confession of the culprit. # The sentence should be carried out within a short period of time, as humanely as possible. (The person is still a human being, although he has dishonoured himself) # Any appeals are given immediate priority with a time limit to be heard.
| |
| |
|
|
jb78000 (1864) | 2 months ago | we do not have it here either. i agree completely with what you say about how it should be done if a country insists on having it. irrefutable evidence such as you mention is pretty rare and the number of cases where it just looks likely (or even just possible) that somebody did something are shockingly high.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
8. sataness (206) | 2 months ago | No, here in England there is no death penalty. The last case of the hanging was of a woman. I cant remember if she was falsely accused of a crime or not (think it was stealing) but, over the period of time there was countless misjudgements, especially at the time when technology, as advanced as today, did not exist. And it's no good when they DO find the right killer to just say 'well.. we're sorry' as it brings no relief other to the family. It wont ever bring that innoccent life back again... Problem is the whole line of 'innoccent until proven guilty' tends to be (in my opinion) misused in every justice system - even in our current without the death penalty. We are so keen to get crimes solved tht sometimes the job doesnt seem to be investigated deeply enough - especially with media time limits! No offence to the hard working police force, but it feels like the force are so aware of their reputation being trashed if they take too long that sometimes they take the most likely person to arrest. Im not sure. Happy Mylotting x
| |
| |
|
|
jb78000 (1864) | 2 months ago | i had to go and check actually. it was much later than i thought - 1964 and there were two - a man and a woman, it was for murder. i agree that in the hurry to solve a crime, especially the nastiest ones, corners are often cut. just as well we don't have the death penalty because those kind of miscarriages are irreversible.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
jb78000 (1864) | 2 months ago | hiya, this is not yet another 'capital punishment right or wrong' although you make good points. was asking about the abuse of the death penalty system in countries that do have it (not just the us). btw i do not want people to just come along and agree with whatever they think my views are - i prefer people to come along and give their honest opinions. like you just did.
| |
|
|
|
jb78000 (1864) | 2 months ago | should have added to the start - and if your country does not have the death penalty feel free to give your opinions anyway - realised that after posting...
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. celticeagle (4878) | 2 months ago | Tricky it is. There are so many people now days that it is difficult to have people brought to trial or justice or whatever in an amount of time that is valid anyway. I think the death penalty is being implemented properly. It just takes so long for it to happen it is rediculous. I think it just needs to happen like they used to just move people out to the gallows in the old days and took care of it right then and there. Not anymore. Too many rights given the guilty in my book.
| |
| |
|
|
jb78000 (1864) | 2 months ago | thing is you need to make sure they are the guilty. otherwise say in the case of a single murder that means two innocent people have died and the guilty suffers no consequences whatsoever.
| |
|
|
celticeagle (4878) | 2 months ago | You are so right. There are people who uncover just these sort of things. Hopefully there will be more of them. Science has taken some giant leaps in this area with DNA and such things but we just have to hope that our courts are diligent and this sort of misjustice doesn't happen.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| | Online Degrees Get Your AA, BA, Masters or PhD at a Top Online School. Start Now. Education.Nextag.com/Online-Degrees
| Top Online School Degrees Earn Your Degree from a Top School Online! Study at Home or Anywhere. CollegeDegreeNetwork.com/Schools
| |
|
|
|
|