Another faint dissonance in the realms of cause and reason - a puzzle?
By urbandekay
@urbandekay (18278)
April 3, 2010 12:04pm CST
Walking by a market stall he sees a dog bed for sale. Here reality cleaves in twain, one moment, two possible futures. In the first he remembers his dogs in the truck and feels a pang of worry that they might be stolen and wonders if he should hurry back but dismisses the idea as superstition and goes about his business taking his time, browsing the stalls. He arrives back at the truck to find the dogs still there.
In the second all events are the same except he is distracted by a stall and spends time investigating it, he arrives back to find the dogs missing.
Viewing the dog bed naturally causes nothing
all the best urban
1 person likes this
1 response
@savypat (20216)
• United States
3 Apr 10
As usual it is man's reaction or action that causes the event. Even things totally outside of man's control such as fire, flood, or earthquake. do not in and of themselves cause man harm. After all it is man's choice to locate himself where these things happen and when doing so not to take the necessary saftey precautions to protect himself. You may feel that there are truly accidents that happen but when researching them will usually find certian choices were made by man
that involved him in the results. Even something as simple as choosing to get out of bed that day. Of course if we tried to live our lives with this in mind we would have no life at all.
@urbandekay (18278)
•
3 Apr 10
The choice to be distracted naturally causes nothing
all the best urban
