Arbitrary killings by the rich, why not?
By najibdina29
@najibdina29 (1309)
Indonesia
August 8, 2011 2:35am CST
Arbitrary killings by the rich, why not? or failure to provide assistance
I strongly believe that the rich fruit of the earth to feed everyone.
Any hoarding money and power, without providing compensation in the poor. But actually doing the killing. A global section, which prohibits but almost mandatory.
Or is everyone so power hungry and blind, when you get on the wrong side.
Suddenly helpless, bury our heads in the sand. And also can still kick your head?
6 people like this
6 responses
@minomarimat (372)
• Philippines
8 Aug 11
Hey, even though the rich people has the power to do that, it's not always the case. we shouldn't immediately generalize or make a wrong conclusion out of the movies. Sometimes what we see in the movies is not true.
@jeanneyvonne (5500)
• Philippines
8 Aug 11
I agree. Some of the rich even give back their blessings to other people, especially the poor. Not everyone is made out of black or white. We all have our weaknesses and we all made mistakes but it does not mean that everybody stays the same (of being rich or poor) or feel the same (that killing is justifiable).
@saparidiki64 (594)
• Indonesia
3 Sep 11
I think that have attracted so much anger that they get to do anything to survive your power.
Because the power to protect.
Furthermore, they are spoiled and get to lead a good life and to maintain your standard of living.
Give something to money and power you would feel like a failure that she deeply saddened. You should no longer be themselves. That would be an assassination attempt the same.
@nakula2009 (2325)
• Indonesia
14 Aug 11
yeah, always blame the others .....
the rich are the others for you - so you're probably poor, rather than envious of big chatter to give you only take time to own nose! how much money from your salary (you should get one) is because of the 3 / 4. world? alone that you have a roof over his head, and you can afford a PC, it means that you are over most people of this planet are damn rich.
moral apostle wannabe!
@gengeni (3308)
• Indonesia
12 Aug 11
But moral obligations are not obligations (social human rights) and can not be made ??without further to do so.
Therefore, other philosophers believe that the starving his legitimate claim to his state or the international community must address.
A third group believes that everyone is responsible for themselves.
@rifnee (1713)
• Indonesia
11 Aug 11
Hallo,
the beginning would be minimum wage, tax relief, accusations of misappropriation of funds, which provide the government in the hope of permanent jobs, gives to these companies.
We must hold the government responsible. For as long as this way prevails, the small business owner and a subsequent press, the little workers, there is no satisfaction.
@kendedes2011 (2712)
• Indonesia
9 Aug 11
Super idea. Man could first establish an association that deals with the opportunities to sue whom and in what form they could.
Remains doubtful, however, whether this really develops the sense of justice and law at the relevant points to a fundamental change to evoke.
