The Bible, the Theory of Evolution or the Ancient Aliens?

Biological Evolution might be a fact, but mechanism of evolution, from primordial man into the "real" man is completely a theory: It is an imperfect fact. Fossils only tell that there were another form of life on past, and it isn't tell that they are our ancestor. Again, the mechanism of evolution is just a theory! Do some research and ask real scientists. You will found that several scientists aren't agree with the Darwin's Evolution Theory. If it is a scientific fact, then most of scientist would believe it. But in fact, it is not. Go ask much real scientists and they will explain that much scientists are not believe that human and apes share a common ancestor. If it is a scientific fact, it wouldn't happen.

Oh, so you already do research, eh? Do you know that thousands of scientists all over the world, especially in US and Europe, had already published their journals and books about refusing the Evolution Theory of Darwin? And which mechanisms of evolution are proven and can be observed? "The Modern Synthetic Evolution Theory"? About random and beneficial mutations? Thousands of scientists already try to prove that the "beneficial mutation" is exists. But after thousands of experiments, they were failed! No such protein can be made only by chance! "Punctuated Equilibrium"? It is against all laws of genetics, biochemical, and biophysics! How can it scientifically proven if it is against the law of genetics, etc. Or do you want to say that The law of genetics, biochemical, and biophysics is not scientifically right? "Natural Selection"? Even since Darwin era, no one ever give a proof that show natural selection can make an organism evolved. No new species being created from natural selection! Fossil Records? Then I believe you already know about "Missing Link"/"Transitional Fossils"? No one ever found any of these! How can you prove something from things that doesn't exist? No "Missing Link" means there's no relation between prehistoric man and modern man! Well, I still have a lot to say, but I think it is enough for now. Now I just want to hear about your research, and would be happy to comment at that

Publishing your own books? Lol. Let me remind you several things: - At the very first place we are trying to tell whether mechanism of evolution is fact or just theory - At the very first place you are trying to convince me to ask "real scientists" - Now I am telling you that much of these "real scientists" are already publishing their journal about refusing this theory - with tons of experiments of course. - And now you are just saying you can easily publish a book? Even I doubt you ever done some experiments. Is it scientifically proven? Thousands scientists against thousands scientists. If it is really "proven and can be observed", will it provoke much controversies? Bacteria immunity? Come on, we are not talking about immunity nor adaptation - we are talking about changing species into another species! Can you tell the difference? Or do you believe this special immunity can ride into another species? Domestication? I think I already tell that some "Biological Evolution" can be considered as fact. But again: we are talking about the changing species into another species! Don't run away from this topic! Immune to Aids? Heat resistance? Please don't mix our topic with adaptation and immunity system! Do you think that is kind of mutation there? Do you think it can changing species into another species? Oh, and one more: please don't mix concept between new species and varieties. About punctuated equilibrium and its contradiction with genetics law. There are no mutation that can repair the genetic information or adding a new information. We are not talking about Hollywood Film, we are talking about the real mutation. And if you are attending Biology Class on high school, I think you already know that almost all mutation only give bad effect - or not giving any effect at all. And hence, the theory of "massive mutation" on Punctuated Equilibrium model is only causing massive destruction on genetic information. No such new species can be made - it is really just against the laws of genetics. So what with classification? Err, do you know that in his book - "The Origin of Species", Charles Darwin stated "Evolution via Natural Selection" as one of fundamental? Should I tell his theory about this? Oh come on, it is you who believe in Evolution! And about missing link.. Oh lol.. Almost every evolutionists got concern with this. Much evolutionists held much excavation in order to find these - although they never found it. And you say it is only a joke? No comment! ----------- You are so pointless - You are running away from our main topic: the changing species from one to another - from prehistoric man to modern man! All of examples you give is really pointless - it has nothing to do to show that there exist a changing species - and whether it is a scientifically proven or not! Now we are back to our topic: Do mechanism of evolution can be proven and observed - or it is just theory? ~note that we are talking about the changing species from one into another~ I guess now we can tell the answer Don't worry, man. I also have some research and read things about this. :D Not only from my view, I also can mention several evolutionists and their comments - oh, and also several of their publications :D Too bad you don't want to participate in this discussion anymore. I can't point another pointless things again then :P

thank you for sharing the title with us, i'd look it up and see if i can get a copy that i can read! :D thanks much!

Only a non essential creature require a creator. God is an essential being and needs no creator. It takes quite a while to explain that God needs no creator because He is a non-created being. If you are really interested in making this argument then you must read, Christian Apologetics by Norman Geisler

Its great to have you in the discussion, thank you for taking time to respond, appreciate your inputs herewith. See you around, and happy mylotting! Cheers! d=) Godbless you.

thank you for sharing your opinion lacieice. I'd say yes, iguess we'd never really know. somehow though, i am hoping to prove that it is indeed God that made us all... when i die perhaps and see the heavens and all that God has prepared... seriously, i'd look forward to this conclusion than to prove i have alien ancestors. he he :D

Appreciate having you here with me in the discussion. Thank you so much for your time, God bless and see you around and happy mylotting!

Appreciate having you here with me in the discussion. Thank you so much for your time, God bless and see you around and happy mylotting!

Its great to have you in the discussion, thank you for taking time to respond, appreciate your inputs herewith. See you around, and happy mylotting! Cheers! d=) Godbless you.

If you are going to deny creation, then you must have answers to some of the problems associated with things like the Big Bang and natural selection. Big Bang - Scientifically explain the origin of the initial matter that exploded and also the magic force that caused it to explode. Natural Selection - Scientifically explain the Cambrian Explosion. The fact that most of the fossil record shows that the innumerable species appear at once and all fully formed. Evolution is a theory not a fact.