Iran outraged by Hollywood war epic
By chardyme
@chardyme (1631)
Philippines
March 13, 2007 7:40pm CST
TEHRAN (AFP) - War epic "300", a smash hit in the United States for its gory portrayal of the Greco-Persian wars, has drawn the wrath of Iranians for showing their ancestors as bloodthirsty "savages".
The press, officials and bloggers have united in denouncing the film as another example of "psychological warfare" against Tehran by its American arch enemy at a time of mounting tension over its nuclear programme.
"Hollywood declares war on Iranians," said the headline in the reformist daily Ayandeh-No of the film which tells the story of the 300 Spartan soldiers fighting off ancient Persians in the Battle of Thermopylae.
"It seeks to tell people that
Iran, which is in the Axis of Evil now, has for long been the source of evil and modern Iranians' ancestors are the ugly murderous dumb savages you see in '300'," fumed the paper on its front page.
A cultural advisor to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad described the film as "American psychological warfare against Iran."
"American cultural officials thought they could get mental satisfaction by plundering Iran's historic past and insulting this civilization," Javad Shamaghdari told semi-official Fars news agency.
Three MPs in the Iranian parliament have also written to the foreign ministry to protest to the production and screening of this "anti-Iranian Hollywood film".
The film has already proved a major box office hit in the United States and, unsurprisingly, Greece.
It is highly improbable the film would ever be screened in the Islamic republic but contraband DVDs of the latest American movies are often available on the streets no sooner that they are internationally released.
Cyber savvy Iranians have already started online petitions and set off "Google bombs" against "300".
The furore over "300" is by no means the first time Iran has been left fuming over Western portrayals of its ancient history.
Iranians were also enraged by the 2004 epic 'Alexander' about the conquest of the Persian Empire and a notorious 2005 British newspaper review of an exhibition of antiquities which branded ancient Persia the "Evil Empire".
1 person likes this
5 responses
@urbangirl (1456)
• Australia
14 Mar 07
The ironic part of this is that modern day Greece has no qualms with Iran and they actually have good relations.
@urbangirl (1456)
• Australia
14 Mar 07
Yep - not everyone in the world is buying that old "Axis of Evil" chestnut.
@urbangirl (1456)
• Australia
14 Mar 07
PS I haven't seen the movie yet but knowing Hollywood, there has to be at least a bit of fabrication in the storyline somewhere and I am not sure what in particular this Iranian official is objecting to. Sounds like a political stunt to me in line with Bush's WMD shite.
Still, Hollywood is Hollywood... it's not the US.

@Cephoozee (373)
• United States
14 Mar 07
It's a friggin' movie! And let me just also add that there is already a movie called 300 Spartans made in the 60's that was the exact same story as in 300, same event, the Persian Empire was still "the bad guy" in the MOVIE, and no one made a fuss over it then. They are only doing it now because there is a conflict over there right now, and frankly, it's immature that they have to write these lies about the movie, and assume that all Americans want to do is turn everyone against Iran, and hypocritical, in the sense that Iran didn't make a fuss over ths 300 Spartans movie. and third, Alexander sucked, who cares?


@prestocaro (1251)
• United States
14 Mar 07
I don't see how they are misconstruing history. I mean, all great empires exist as a result of conquest. It's the nature of the beast, it's how you support all of those people who live under the rule of an emperor/king, etc. It isn't as though the persians look like they are killing for fun -- they want a tribute, which many great empires demanded from smaller tribes and civilizations. I thought the movie made the Persians look pretty good -- they had lots of people, lots of money, exotic animals and tools of war, and a statuesque leader.
@winjzz (157)
• Malaysia
15 Mar 07
Agreed. I dont think the Persians were bloodthirsty in any way. It was probably standard empire expansion procedures of the time and the battle with the spartans was just business. Only that the spartans are probably not the kind of people to be messed with.
@painkiller77 (2073)
• India
4 Sep 08
ANCIENT IRAN WAS PERSIA. so, they got pis**d off on seeing this type of portrayal of their culture.but to me 300 is an absolutely terrific movie. the attitude, the valour the spartans display send a chill down my spine. so much to keep their honour. they challenged and even demured a person who projected himself as god. i think they were bogged down by the wrong priests who just had no respect for these warriors. my personal favorite line in the movie when the king says : SPARTANS NEVER RETREAT!!!!!!!!!!. the greatest sequence when the king as a young lad fights the beast and also , when he kicks the intruder into the well..
@delabam (96)
• Canada
6 Aug 08
the movie 300 has pictured "xerxes" the king of persia "iran'' and the whole looks of the persian army wrong and that is why the persians today are obset . about the persian empire and xerxes in my history class and the 300 image of xerxes is completly wrong .






