Marriage - or not

September 21, 2007 5:14pm CST
I have been with my partner 22 years and 3 months, and we have been living together for 22 years and 1 month. We have 3 children 16, 10 & 8 and we get along fine. I am fed up with people keep telling me we should get married....why? They say we should make a commitment to eachother, I think we have made a comittment to eachother by having 3 kids together. They can't just be torn up like a marriage certificate.
12 people like this
21 responses
@ian1010 (459)
• Philippines
22 Sep 07
having children does not equate to being committed.,marriage in the point of view of the Church is a sacrament and covenant with God not just papers and anyting.,now if you don't believe in the sacraments and in God it's not bad not to get married except that your children can't use their father's last name if your not married to him.,and ofcourse once he lefts you for another woman or gets married to another his children with you would be illigitimate and that's very bad.,and because there is no marriage with the both of you.,then there's no security for you if ever he'll leave you.,and lastly if you want to live a moral life according to the Church then you should get married to the man your living with
2 people like this
@ian1010 (459)
• Philippines
25 Sep 07
harhar
1 person likes this
22 Sep 07
Over here in the UK, children can take their fathers name, mine all have their Dads name, so do I, I changed mine by deed poll 10 years ago. I don't know why you have said "once he has left you for another woman......" who says that is going to happen? That can happen whether you are married or not, a piece of paper won't stop that from happening. As for 'illigitimacy, may I point you to an excerpt from Wikipedia. "In the United Kingdom, the notion of bastardy was effectively abolished by the Children Act 1989, which came into force in 1991. It introduced the concept of perental responsibility, which ensures that a child may have a legal father even if the parents were not married". We both have security and we both lead a very moral life.
2 people like this
@laydee (12798)
• Philippines
22 Sep 07
When I read the discussion and the comments, one question ranged in my mind. Do you want to marry the guy? or are you contented of your situation? I don't mean to be judgmental but I don't think having children is a commitment at all. There are many people who have had a lot of children with someone but eventually left them for another. So is with marriage, there are many couples having divorces or partners cheating. So I guess it boils down to one thing. Do you want to marry this guy? If I am asked, I have always wanted to have someone who commit not just to me but to my family and to God that he'd do his best to take care of me and our family. The joy of walking down the aisle committing that this is the day I start to be Mrs. something. Committing to my heart that this is the man I'd spend the rest of my days with. It's not purely traditional, I guess, because after a few years the 'event' would remind you how you chose your husband and committed to him (so will the husband remember this). It's sort of a memorabilia that will forever be marked in your heart as a couple (regardless if there are kids or not). Well, that's just me. But the focus is on you, do you have the fantasy of marrying him? or is it just the contentment that you already have kids so that's enough? A marriage certificate is not the whole point in the marriage by the way, it's the commitment of publicly declaring the love not just with each other but with God and the family as well. Actions do speak louder than words, but we all need to hear the words once in a while to confirm such actions. :) But it really depends on you. What would you want in your life? Good luck. And hopefully you would not get irritated with people telling you to get married. They have their fantasy of seeing you and your partner as husband and wife ~ don't blame them for wanting to see that. =)
2 people like this
22 Sep 07
What does it prove by saying that I want to marry him, what difference would it make to us? Yes I want to spend the rest of my life with him, but I don't need a piece of paper to prove it. I don't feel I need to publicly declare my love for him, thats private as far as I am concerned. The contentment I have with him and my children is enough for me. We have a nice home, cars, holidays, the kids are happy and well adjusted, they know we are not married but to be honest lots of their friends parents are not married either. We all have the same surname, mine was changed by deed poll 10 years ago.
1 person likes this
@laydee (12798)
• Philippines
23 Sep 07
Well, it proves so much. If you don't want to marry the person in public then don't. That's the main point there. If you think you're contented with what you have right now then don't change it. Each society has different beliefs in relationships. If your society feels comfortable with not getting married then that's fine. But there are societies like mine which sees the importance of marriage, so we do so. To each his/her own. =)
1 person likes this
@megs85 (3142)
• Australia
22 Sep 07
Personally, I think it's completely up to a couple to decide whether they want to "formalise" their commitment via marriage, and to me... marriage is simply that... a formality. Declaring that you are a couple with a commitment to one another. My fiancee's Uncle (and Auntie as I've always called her), have been together for 19 years, and engaged for 15. They have three kids together, and are only now getting married- the wedding is four weeks away... My partner's other Auntie has been with her man for 16 years, and it's fairly well known that they will never get married. They have two kids toegther, and just don't see the point. Scott, my fiancee, and I have only been together for about four years, and are plannin gon getting married next year. We have a child together, and another one on the way. Although we don't see it as "neccessary" to get married- if ya get what I mean- we want to. Sounds silly but I want to have the same last name as my family (married or not they are my family- my fiancee and my kids), and I like the idea of the "wedding" day..lol... Little girl here in big girl shoes lol... So, all in all, my point was that I think it's fine if you guys never get married. Marriage isn't always forver nowadays anyway. People get divorced. If you're happy, then people should be happy for you, in my opinion...
@megs85 (3142)
• Australia
22 Sep 07
Thanks Scorpio. I'm all for "what works for one doesn't necessarily work for another" in pretty much all aspects of life.
1 person likes this
22 Sep 07
Oh that's just what I like to hear, thanks for your response and hope you have a lovely wedding day.
1 person likes this
@reeseyj (906)
• United States
22 Sep 07
No you did not make a commitment to eachother by having three kids together you just made a commitment to the kids to raise them. If u didnt think it was wrong it wouldnt bother u so much. Its your life and you have to deal with the out come so y would what other people have say bother u unless......?
1 person likes this
@reeseyj (906)
• United States
22 Sep 07
If everything you have with this man is not all the right reasons. Then what is? How does your boyfriend about this decision.
1 person likes this
23 Sep 07
My boyfriend is happy with our situation.. If I really wanted to get married he would go with it, like wise, if he wanted to get married I would go with it but it is not important to either of us.
1 person likes this
22 Sep 07
I don;t think it is wrong not to be married and it doesn't bother me 'taht much', but what irritates me is the same couple of friends keep nagging at me to get married when we are perfectly ok as we are. What I do think is wrong is getting married for all the wrong reasons.
1 person likes this
@smacksman (6053)
22 Sep 07
You are a classic example of a good and lasting relationship and proves that you don't have to have a piece of paper from the church or magistrates to stay together. My wife of 37 years and I have a piece of paper from the church, but that is not why we have stayed together nor for the sake of our children - they are messing up their lives all by themselves without any help from us! haha. No, we just get on well together.
1 person likes this
@smacksman (6053)
22 Sep 07
I was born in Bromley but now live just down the Estuary near Colchester, the oldest town in England. We don't live exotic lives here but we have fresh air, good neighbours and a healthy lifestyle. Life is GOOD!!
1 person likes this
22 Sep 07
Thankyou to a fellow Brit! Yes we just get on together, we have our ups and downs like anyone else, mainly over the kids! Where abouts in Essex are you? I am from Gravesend
1 person likes this
24 Sep 07
Colchester! Yes I saw a documentary on the tv a while ago about it being the oldest town, I seem to remember some sort of archway into the town.. We took the kids (my illegitimate children that is :-)to Colchester Zoo recently, brilliant day out, they loved it. Anyway thanks for your commentsm ade me smile.
1 person likes this
@gesell03 (173)
• Philippines
22 Sep 07
legally speaking, it would be better that you get married so that your children will become legitimate, but if you dont want it, then dont do it, you dont have to prove anything to them.
1 person likes this
@dreamy1 (3811)
• United States
22 Sep 07
I don't see how having a marriage certificate is going to make her children any more legitimate than they already are now. They are already born and here so how is having a piece of paper going to change anything about her kids and how they live their lives today? There's no question who the parents are how are they not legitimate?
1 person likes this
22 Sep 07
Thanks dreamy, that summed up what I was thinking
1 person likes this
@anup12 (4177)
• India
26 Sep 07
Yes to some extend I agree. But please think of the legal angle also not only the social angle. Because legally one should be husband,wife then if there is any tussle between them your right cannot be ignored.
1 person likes this
@nandans (1160)
• India
22 Sep 07
Depends person to person on how they thing.. I think its a pleasure to get married in all aspects of line.. Feel a bit responsible and be a complete person.
22 Sep 07
I think we are already responsible, we don't need to be married. For some people getting married is all about the big floaty dress and being the centre of attention for the day, not for me thanks. They spend thousands of pounds on the day and six months later it's all over.
1 person likes this
@rosie_123 (6113)
26 Sep 07
I totally understand where you are coming from Scorpio2111, though I find that this is happening less and less now, as more than 50% of couples here in the UK are living together rather than being married. But certainly in earlier years (my partner have been living together 20 years and 5 months now!), - we used to get it all the time. Fact is - marriage means nothing in our eyes - we are fully committed to each other just as I am sure you and your man are, so why have a piece of paper to prove it? Love is about sharing, caring and respect - you can have that whether married or not, and children that are loved and looked after by two loving, unmarried parents, are far better off than those who are born "in wedlock" and then see their parents go through a traumatic divorce a few years later. Please don't let these people get you down - as long as you and your partner are happy - it is none of anyone else's business.
26 Sep 07
Thank you for your comments. It's nice to hear about someone else in the same boat!
2 people like this
22 Sep 07
So long as you love each other and love your kids, who needs a piece of paper. You have shown your committment by the mere fact that you have been together for such along time and raised three lovely kids. Who cares if you have a piece of paper saying you are married, you have already made your committments
1 person likes this
• United States
22 Sep 07
You have obviously already made a commitment to each other if youve been together that long. I would just ignore what others are saying. A lot of people just say that a marriage certificate is just a piece of paper. And in a way i guess they are right. If you two dont want to get married then you shouldnt. Your obviously very happy just the way you are. I dont think it would change anything if you did get married. I would tell these people that your quite happy just the way you are.
1 person likes this
24 Sep 07
Thankyou for your comments, nmhschic2004
1 person likes this
• India
22 Sep 07
Hi!Well, what are your personal feelings towards MARRIAGE? Leave the world aside. If ,you both seem to have a perfect understanding,what others say should not matter to you.If you want to have a security for children, regarding inheritance of property & other things, you may go ahead accordingly.This is something that YOU have to decide for yourself.Think well & do according to your satisfaction. ALL THE BEST!! GOD BLESS!! www.creatingcolourfulfuture.com
1 person likes this
24 Sep 07
Thanks for your comments bharatibajaj
1 person likes this
@CEN7777 (855)
• India
22 Sep 07
hi scorpio, congratulation you are together from long 22 years, I do not think now u need to get married. In my view marriage is an honest commitment with each other and you both are very well commited from long time and U both trust on each other.So with these three childrens you both are happy, I don't think u need a piece of paper ( marriage certificate) to certify your relations. You both are happily living ,It is just marriage without any certificate which is well accepted by both of U. SO keep going without any hesitation. good luck.
22 Sep 07
Thankyou CEN777, my thoughts exactly
1 person likes this
@meaculpa (338)
• Philippines
22 Sep 07
Marriage is also based from the couples' beliefs, values, education, culture. If both of you believed that you just have to be living-in together for so many years without a need for the marriage certificate, that's your choice. It is good for you if you live peacefully with your couple and kids, providing them their needs, being responsible. However, when it comes to legality, the surnames of your children would be followed after the mother's not the fathers. (depending upon the country's laws) If you have lived for a long time without the marriage certificate, these children are called illegitimate. If ever you leave and has lots of properties, their fraction or share would be half of the legitimate's. If ever your spouse would need to claim some benefits from the government (depending also in the country where you live) she cannot file for he/she has no paper, evidence to show that he/she is married with you. There are lots of legal perceptions to be considered and maybe you have overlooked those. Try not to bet angry with people who keep on telling you about marriage because they only care for you. Good luck to you!
22 Sep 07
Over here in the UK, the children can have their fathers surname, as mine do, as long as he is at the birth registration. We have our wills etc, and a good financial/legal advisor that has covered everything for us. I don't really get angry, it's just that one friend in particular keeps telling me that marriage would make our relationship better, why? we are fine as we are.
1 person likes this
@men82in (1268)
• India
22 Sep 07
I think they might be telling you for legal purposes. The present scenerio the legal bindings are a must for life. As you were under life past twenty years is not necessary. Of course you might be registered about you dependants with the government for i.d. purpose and passport purposes, this itself is necessary. My last wish is that whatever they the other people wordings be careful about not to split in and for your family . The olden day belief and astrology methods as such after twenty or twentyfive years a marriage occasion should be for the same couple, but it is an misbelief.
1 person likes this
• United States
22 Sep 07
I can understand your frustration. Having a history of 22 years and three children is more proof of a commitment than having a ceremony and a license. People will always have judgments on how others should live their lives. If not being married is working for you and you are happy it shouldn't be a problem, especially for someone outside of your relationship.
1 person likes this
@ssf12ster (488)
• India
22 Sep 07
see u need to tie the knot.that is the commitment which is required here i think.so do it fast otherwise they will comment more.who cares there should be valid docs here buddy!
1 person likes this
@izathewzia (5134)
• Philippines
22 Sep 07
It really depends on what you believe. There are people who believes that tying a not is more binding and solid. There are those that happiness and respect is enough to make them survive the partnership even without getting married. Me personally, i choose to get married. I am, acutally, in civil. But i wanted a church wedding.
@Ramsakha (205)
• India
21 Sep 07
Well that is up you.It is your life and you have every right to live the way you want. For me, marriage is a social institution. It is a necessary part of my life.
1 person likes this
• Philippines
22 Sep 07
wow, 22years! congratulations!!! I don't believe marriage is not necessary to strengthen your relationship. It's just a license for you to use your partner's name legally, the right to be called Mrs.Yourhusband'sSurname. If these things doesn't matter to you, then you don't have to get married. I'm happy for you both :)
1 person likes this